Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22696371›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Enhanced glucose control for preventing and treating diabetic neuropathy.

Brian C Callaghan, Ann A Little, Eva L Feldman, Richard A C Hughes

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 285 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
285citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
18.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

285 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 573 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Alpha-lipoic acid for diabetic peripheral neuropathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Acetyl-L-carnitine for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

225 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Brian C CallaghanDepartment of Neurology, University ofMichigan, Ann Arbor,Michigan, USA. bcallagh@med.umich.edu.
Ann A Little
Eva L Feldman
Richard A C Hughes
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Integrated Systems Biology Approach to Diabetic Microvascular ComplicationsR24DK082841 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ABCOUWER, STEVEN F, BROSIUS, FRANK C · 2008 to 2020
$13.1M
Tissue-Specific Metabolic Reprogramming in Diabetic ComplicationsDP3DK094292 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BROSIUS, FRANK C, BURANT, CHARLES F · 2011 to 2011
$5.5M
Targeting Inflammation using Salsalate in Type 1 Diabetic Neuropathy (TINSAL-T1DNR03DK094499 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BUSUI (POP-BUSUI), RODICA, FELDMAN, EVA LUCILLE · 2011 to 2011
$78k
NIDDK NIH HHS DP3 DK094292NIDDK NIH HHS R03 DK094499NIDDK NIH HHS R24 DK082841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are two types of diabetes. Type 1 diabetes affects younger people and needs treatment with insulin injections. Type 2 diabetes affects older people and can usually be treated by diet and oral drugs. Diabetic neuropathy affects 10% of patients with diabetes mellitus at diagnosis and 40% to 50% after 10 years. Enhanced glucose control is the best studied intervention for the prevention of this disabling condition but there have been no systematic reviews of the evidence.

objectivesTo examine the evidence for enhanced glucose control in the prevention of distal symmetric polyneuropathy in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (30 January 2012), CENTRAL (2012, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2012) and EMBASE (1980 to January 2012) for randomized controlled trials of enhanced glucose control in diabetes mellitus. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomized, controlled studies investigating enhanced glycemic control that reported neuropathy outcomes after at least one year of intervention. Our primary outcome measure was annual development of clinical neuropathy defined by a clinical scale. Secondary outcomes included motor nerve conduction velocity and quantitative vibration testing. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently reviewed all titles and abstracts identified by the database searches for inclusion. Two authors abstracted data from all included studies with a standardized form. A third author mediated conflicts. We analyzed the presence of clinical neuropathy with annualized risk differences (RDs), and conduction velocity and quantitative velocity measurements with mean differences per year. MAIN

resultsThis review identified 17 randomized studies that addressed whether enhanced glucose control prevents the development of neuropathy. Seven of these studies were conducted in people with type 1 diabetes, eight in type 2 diabetes, and two in both types. A meta-analysis of the two studies that reported the primary outcome (incidence of clinical neuropathy) with a total of 1228 participants with type 1 diabetes revealed a significantly reduced risk of developing clinical neuropathy in those with enhanced glucose control, an annualized RD of -1.84% (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.11 to -2.56). In a similar analysis of four studies that reported the primary outcome, involving 6669 participants with type 2 diabetes, the annualized RD of developing clinical neuropathy was -0.58% (95% CI 0.01 to -1.17). Most secondary outcomes were significantly in favor of intensive treatment in both populations. However, both types of diabetic participants also had a significant increase in severe adverse events including hypoglycemic events. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAccording to high-quality evidence, enhanced glucose control significantly prevents the development of clinical neuropathy and reduces nerve conduction and vibration threshold abnormalities in type 1 diabetes mellitus. In type 2 diabetes mellitus, enhanced glucose control reduces the incidence of clinical neuropathy, although this was not formally statistically significant (P = 0.06). However, enhanced glucose control does significantly reduce nerve conduction and vibration threshold abnormalities. Importantly, enhanced glucose control significantly increases the risk of severe hypoglycemic episodes, which needs to be taken into account when evaluating its risk/benefit ratio.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NeuropathiesHumansHyperglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID22696371
PMCPMC4048127
OpenAlexW2113880168

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.