Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22757737›Full record

ReviewWomen's health (London, England)2012

Disparities in heart failure and other cardiovascular diseases among women.

Jean McSweeney, Christina Pettey, Leanne L Lefler, Seongkum Heo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Women's health (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sex differences in outcomes of heart failure in an ambulatory, population-based cohort from 2009 to 2013.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jean McSweeneyCollege of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA. mcsweeneyjeanc@uams.edu
Christina Pettey
Leanne L Lefler
Seongkum Heo
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

NINR NIH HHS 1-F31-NR012347-01A1NINR NIH HHS F31 NR012347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews literature pertinent to cardiovascular disparities in women, focusing primarily on heart failure (HF). It provides an in-depth look at causes, biological influences, self-management and lack of adherence to HF-treatment guidelines in women. Disparities in treatment of causative factors of HF, such as myocardial infarction and hypertension, contribute to women having poorer HF outcomes than men. This article discusses major contributing reasons for nonadherence to medication regimes for HF in women, including advanced age at time of diagnosis, likelihood of multiple comorbidities, lack of social support and low socioeconomic status. Limited inclusion of women in clinical trials and the scarcity of gender analyses for HF and other cardiovascular diseases continues to limit the applicability of research findings to women.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHeart FailureAdultComorbidityFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHospitalizationHumansMaleRisk FactorsSex DistributionUnited StatesWomen's Health

Identifiers

PMID22757737
PMCPMC3459240
OpenAlexW2134367493

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.