ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2013
Cost and management of males with closed fractures.
Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metasynthesis of Patient Attitudes Toward Bone Densitometry.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Osteoporosis Treatment Efficacy for Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2017Pooled it
- Cost-Effectiveness of Biosimilar Denosumab Versus Bisphosphonates in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening Strategies for Men.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2016Article
- Denosumab for Elderly Men with Osteoporosis: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from the US Payer Perspective.Journal of osteoporosis · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledThe purpose of this study was to examine the medical costs and the management of osteoporosis in the 12 months after a closed fracture for men aged ≥ 45 years. The mean medical cost per fracture was high ($6,078-$30,900), and osteoporosis management post fracture was inadequate in the majority of men.
introductionThis study was conducted in order to examine the medical costs following fracture in males and the management of osteoporosis post fracture.
methodsAdministrative claims from a large, national health plan were analyzed. Men ≥ 45 years were included if they had ≥ 1 medical claim for a new closed fracture between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2008. Commercially insured (COM) and Medicare Advantage Plan (MAP) members were analyzed separately. Costs were calculated as paid amounts and adjusted to 2010 dollars. Both the differences between the individual patients' 12-month pre-fracture and 12-month post-fracture costs and the costs directly attributed to the fracture were reported. The prevalence of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan and/or osteoporosis pharmacotherapy treatment was evaluated in the 12 months post fracture.
resultsWe identified 18,917 (COM, 16,191; MAP, 2,726) men with new closed fractures. Non-hip, non-vertebral fractures (NHNV) were the most common fracture in both COM and MAP populations. Fracture costs ranged from $7,121 to $15,830 for vertebral fractures, from $22,601 to $30,900 for hip fractures, and from $6,078 to $8,344 for NHNV fractures. In the COM and MAP populations, respectively, 8.5 and 15.5 % had a DXA scan and/or osteoporosis pharmacotherapy in the 12 months following the fracture.
conclusionsHealthcare costs associated with fractures in men are substantial. About 1 in 12 men ≥ 45 years in the COM population were provided adequate follow-up for osteoporosis post fracture. While this rate improved to about one in six men in the MAP population, osteoporosis management in men post fracture is far from optimal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.