ReviewResults and problems in cell differentiation2012
Stem cells and corneal epithelial maintenance: insights from the mouse and other animal models.
Review in Results and problems in cell differentiation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- First pilot study of intrastromal rAAV-PAX6 gene therapy suggests improved corneal thickness and transcription correction in aniridic mouse.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- Oxidative stress-regulatory role of miR-10b-5p in the diabetic human cornea revealed through integrated multi-omics analysis.Diabetologia · 2026Article
- Review
- Glucocorticoid Receptor Signaling Is Critical for Mouse Corneal Development, Inhibition of Inflammatory Response, and Neovascularization of the Cornea.The American journal of pathology · 2024Article
- Review
- Review
- Review
- Eyes open on stem cells.Stem cell reports · 2023Review
- Review
- rAAV-PHP.B escapes the mouse eye and causes lethality whereas rAAV9 can transduce aniridic corneal limbal stem cells without lethality.Gene therapy · 2023Article
- Cellular and molecular profiles of larval and adult Xenopus corneal epithelia resolved at the single-cell level.Developmental biology · 2022Article
- Efficacious, safe, and stable inhibition of corneal neovascularization by AAV-vectored anti-VEGF therapeutics.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2021Article
- A single cell atlas of human cornea that defines its development, limbal progenitor cells and their interactions with the immune cells.The ocular surface · 2021Article
- Discrete limbal epithelial stem cell populations mediate corneal homeostasis and wound healing.Cell stem cell · 2021Article
- Regenerative Approaches and Future Trends for the Treatment of Corneal Burn Injuries.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Differentiation Induction of Human Stem Cells for Corneal Epithelial Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Corneal Stem Cells as a Source of Regenerative Cell-Based Therapy.Stem cells international · 2020Review
- Influence of polydimethylsiloxane substrate stiffness on corneal epithelial cells.Royal Society open science · 2019Article
- Effect of Ionizing Radiation from Computed Tomography on Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells into Neural Precursors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Molecular markers for corneal epithelial cells in larval vs. adult Xenopus frogs.Experimental eye research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Maintenance of the corneal epithelium is essential for vision and is a dynamic process incorporating constant cell production, movement and loss. Although cell-based therapies involving the transplantation of putative stem cells are well advanced for the treatment of human corneal defects, the scientific understanding of these interventions is poor. No definitive marker that discriminates stem cells that maintain the corneal epithelium from the surrounding tissue has been discovered and the identity of these elusive cells is, therefore, hotly debated. The key elements of corneal epithelial maintenance have long been recognised but it is still not known how this dynamic balance is co-ordinated during normal homeostasis to ensure the corneal epithelium is maintained at a uniform thickness. Most indirect experimental evidence supports the limbal epithelial stem cell (LESC) hypothesis, which proposes that the adult corneal epithelium is maintained by stem cells located in the limbus at the corneal periphery. However, this has been challenged recently by the corneal epithelial stem cell (CESC) hypothesis, which proposes that during normal homeostasis the mouse corneal epithelium is maintained by stem cells located throughout the basal corneal epithelium with LESCs only contributing during wound healing. In this chapter we review experimental studies, mostly based on animal work, that provide insights into how stem cells maintain the normal corneal epithelium and consider the merits of the alternative LESC and CESC hypotheses. Finally, we highlight some recent research on other stem cell systems and consider how this could influence future research directions for identifying the stem cells that maintain the corneal epithelium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.