Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22952736›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Therapeutic effects of hMAPC and hMSC transplantation after stroke in mice.

Silvia Mora-Lee, Ma Salomé Sirerol-Piquer, María Gutiérrez-Pérez, Ulises Gomez-Pinedo, Valerie D Roobrouck, Tania López, Mayte Casado-Nieto, Gloria Abizanda, Maria Teresa Rabena, Catherine Verfaille and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Role of Stem Cells in the Therapy of Stroke.Current neuropharmacology · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Stem Cell Therapy in Cerebrovascular Disease.Current treatment options in neurology · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Is Immunomodulation a Principal Mechanism Underlying How Cell-Based Therapies Enhance Stroke Recovery?Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Silvia Mora-LeeHematology and Cell Therapy Area, Clinica Universidad de Navarra and Division of Cancer, Center for Applied Medical Research, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Ma Salomé Sirerol-Piquer
María Gutiérrez-Pérez
Ulises Gomez-Pinedo
Valerie D Roobrouck
Tania López
Mayte Casado-Nieto
Gloria Abizanda
Maria Teresa Rabena
Catherine Verfaille
Felipe Prósper
Jose Manuel García-Verdugo
Clinica Universidad de Navarra · ESUniversitat de València · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESKU Leuven · BEStem Cell Institute · PAUniversidad de Navarra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke represents an attractive target for stem cell therapy. Although different types of cells have been employed in animal models, a direct comparison between cell sources has not been performed. The aim of our study was to assess the effect of human multipotent adult progenitor cells (hMAPCs) and human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) on endogenous neurogenesis, angiogenesis and inflammation following stroke. BALB/Ca-RAG 2(-/-) γC(-/-) mice subjected to FeCl(3) thrombosis mediated stroke were intracranially injected with 2 × 10(5) hMAPCs or hMSCs 2 days after stroke and followed for up to 28 days. We could not detect long-term engraftment of either cell population. However, in comparison with PBS-treated animals, hMSC and hMAPC grafted animals demonstrated significantly decreased loss of brain tissue. This was associated with increased angiogenesis, diminished inflammation and a glial-scar inhibitory effect. Moreover, enhanced proliferation of cells in the subventricular zone (SVZ) and survival of newly generated neuroblasts was observed. Interestingly, these neuroprotective effects were more pronounced in the group of animals treated with hMAPCs in comparison with hMSCs. Our results establish cell therapy with hMAPCs and hMSCs as a promising strategy for the treatment of stroke.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAdult Stem CellsAnimalsBrainCell MovementCell SurvivalHumansInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryMaleMiceMultipotent Stem CellsNeovascularization, PhysiologicStroke

Identifiers

PMID22952736
PMCPMC3432058
OpenAlexW1992069177

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.