Evidence mapPaperPMID 23028897Full record

Trial reportPloS one2012

A randomized trial of selenium supplementation and risk of type-2 diabetes, as assessed by plasma adiponectin.

Margaret P Rayman, Gabrielle Blundell-Pound, Roberto Pastor-Barriuso, Eliseo Guallar, Holger Steinbrenner, Saverio Stranges

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Review ofNutrients · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for selenium.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Margaret P RaymanFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom. m.rayman@surrey.ac.uk
Gabrielle Blundell-Pound
Roberto Pastor-Barriuso
Eliseo Guallar
Holger Steinbrenner
Saverio Stranges
University of Surrey · GBCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ESHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DESpanish National Centre for Cardiovascular Research · ESUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence that selenium affects the risk of type-2 diabetes is conflicting, with observational studies and a few randomized trials showing both lower and higher risk linked to the level of selenium intake and status. We investigated the effect of selenium supplementation on the risk of type-2 diabetes in a population of relatively low selenium status as part of the UK PRECISE (PREvention of Cancer by Intervention with SElenium) pilot study. Plasma adiponectin concentration, a recognised independent predictor of type-2 diabetes risk and known to be correlated with circulating selenoprotein P, was the biomarker chosen.

methodsIn a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, five hundred and one elderly volunteers were randomly assigned to a six-month intervention with 100, 200 or 300 µg selenium/d as high-selenium or placebo yeast. Adiponectin concentration was measured by ELISA at baseline and after six months of treatment in 473 participants with one or both plasma samples available.

resultsMean (SD) plasma selenium concentration was 88.5 ng/g (19.1) at baseline and increased significantly in the selenium-treatment groups. In baseline cross-sectional analyses, the fully adjusted geometric mean of plasma adiponectin was 14% lower (95% CI, 0-27%) in the highest than in the lowest quartile of plasma selenium (P for linear trend = 0.04). In analyses across randomized groups, however, selenium supplementation had no effect on adiponectin levels after six months of treatment (P = 0.96).

conclusionsThese findings are reassuring as they did not show a diabetogenic effect of a six-month supplementation with selenium in this sample of elderly individuals of relatively low selenium status.

Indexed as

AdiponectinAgedBiomarkersDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dietary SupplementsDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPlacebosRiskSeleniumSelenoprotein PAdiponectinBiomarkersPlacebosSeleniumSelenoprotein P

Identifiers

PMID23028897
PMCPMC3446875
OpenAlexW2017899915

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.