Trial reportClinical drug investigation2012
Pharmacokinetics of a fixed-dose combination of mitiglinide and metformin versus concurrent administration of individual formulations in healthy subjects: a randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, single-dose, crossover study.
Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of oral mitiglinide on glucose lowering in healthy Chinese volunteers.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2017Trial
- Pharmacokinetic study of metformin to compare voglibose/metformin fixed-dose combination with coadministered voglibose and metformin.International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2015Trial
- Safety, Efficacy, and Bioavailability of Fixed-Dose Combinations in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Updated Review.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimentalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the treatment of diabetes mellitus, combined drugs with different mechanisms of action can be effective when adequate glycaemic control is difficult with monotherapy. A fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet of mitiglinide and metformin has been developed as a second-line treatment for type 2 diabetes.
objectivesThe objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of a FDC and a free combination of mitiglinide and metformin in healthy male subjects.
methodsA randomized, open-label, two-period, two-treatment, single-dose, crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy Korean male subjects. In one period, a FDC tablet of mitiglinide and metformin (10 mg/500 mg) was administered, and in the other period, corresponding doses of individual formulations were administered.
resultsTwenty-four subjects were enrolled and 19 subjects completed the study. The geometric mean ratios (90 % confidence interval) of the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration (AUC(last)) were 0.9694 (0.8120, 1.1573) and 0.8951 (0.8440, 0.9494) for mitiglinide, and 1.0235 (0.9373, 1.1057) and 1.0542 (0.9697, 1.1460) for metformin, which were within the bioequivalence range. Among the 23 subjects who received study drugs, 15 subjects experienced 34 adverse events (AEs). The most frequently reported AEs were feeling hot and compensatory sweating. There were no serious AEs and no significant differences in the incidence of AEs between the two treatments.
conclusionA FDC tablet of mitiglinide and metformin was generally well tolerated in healthy male subjects. Administration of a FDC tablet and concomitant administration of individual formulations did not show significantly different pharmacokinetic profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.