Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23199930›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2012

Models of electrical activity: calibration and prediction testing on the same cell.

Maurizio Tomaiuolo, Richard Bertram, Gareth Leng, Joël Tabak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cell-specific cardiac electrophysiology models.PLoS computational biology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maurizio TomaiuoloDepartment of Biological Science and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Richard Bertram
Gareth Leng
Joël Tabak

Funding

REGULATION OF PROLACTIN SECRETION AT THE LACTOTROPHR01DK043200 · NIDDK · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BERTRAM, RICHARD, GONZALEZ-IGLESIAS, ARTURO EDUARDO · 1992 to 2014
$4.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK43200NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK043200Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical models are increasingly important in biology, and testability is becoming a critical issue. One limitation is that one model simulation tests a parameter set representing one instance of the biological counterpart, whereas biological systems are heterogeneous in their properties and behavior, and a model often is fitted to represent an ideal average. This is also true for models of a cell's electrical activity; even within a narrowly defined population there can be considerable variation in electrophysiological phenotype. Here, we describe a computational experimental approach for parameterizing a model of the electrical activity of a cell in real time. We combine the inexpensive parallel computational power of a programmable graphics processing unit with the flexibility of the dynamic clamp method. The approach involves 1), recording a cell's electrical activity, 2), parameterizing a model to the recording, 3), generating predictions, and 4), testing the predictions on the same cell used for the calibration. We demonstrate the experimental feasibility of our approach using a cell line (GH4C1). These cells are electrically active, and they display tonic spiking or bursting. We use our approach to predict parameter changes that can convert one pattern to the other.

Indexed as

Membrane PotentialsModels, BiologicalAnimalsCalibrationCell LinePatch-Clamp TechniquesRats

Identifiers

PMID23199930
PMCPMC3491713

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.