Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23212310›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2013

The difference between stiffness and quasi-stiffness in the context of biomechanical modeling.

Elliott J Rouse, Robert D Gregg, Levi J Hargrove, Jonathon W Sensinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Atypical triceps surae force and work patterns underlying gait in children with cerebral palsy.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Design and Validation of a Partial-Assist Knee Orthosis with Compact, Backdrivable Actuation.IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings] · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elliott J RouseDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA. e-rouse@u.northwestern.edu
Robert D Gregg
Levi J Hargrove
Jonathon W Sensinger

Funding

Determination of dynamic ankle impedance while walkingF31NS074687 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI ROUSE, ELLIOTT J · 2011 to 2011
$33k
NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS074687NINDS NIH HHS F31NS074687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ankle contributes the majority of mechanical power during walking and is a frequently studied joint in biomechanics. Specifically, researchers have extensively investigated the torque-angle relationship for the ankle during dynamic tasks, such as walking and running. The slope of this relationship has been termed the "quasi-stiffness." However, over time, researchers have begun to interchange the concepts of quasi-stiffness and stiffness. This is an especially important distinction as researchers currently begin to investigate the appropriate control systems for recently developed powered prosthetic legs. The quasi-stiffness and stiffness are distinct concepts in the context of powered joints, and are equivalent in the context of passive joints. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the difference between the stiffness and quasi-stiffness using a simple impedance-controlled inverted pendulum model and a more sophisticated biped walking model, each with the ability to modify the trajectory of an impedance controller's equilibrium angle position. In both cases, stiffness values are specified by the controller and the quasi-stiffness are shown during a single step. Both models have widely varying quasi-stiffness but each have a single stiffness value. Therefore, from this simple modeling approach, the differences and similarities between these two concepts are elucidated.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdultAnkle JointBiomechanical PhenomenaElasticityHumansMaleTorqueViscosityWalking

Identifiers

PMID23212310
PMCPMC4266141

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.