ArticleBiochemical pharmacology2013
3-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-[3-(4-nitrophenyl)ureido]propanamide enantiomers with human formyl-peptide receptor agonist activity: molecular modeling of chiral recognition by FPR2.
Article in Biochemical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inflammaging and Immunosenescence in the Post-COVID Era: Small Molecules, Big Challenges.ChemMedChem · 2025Review
- Pyridazinones and Structurally Related Derivatives with Anti-Inflammatory Activity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Contribution of Formyl Peptide Receptor Dysfunction to the Course of Neuroinflammation: A Potential Role in the Brain Pathology.Current neuropharmacology · 2020Review
- Design, synthesis and evaluation of PD176252 analogues for ameliorating cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity.MedChemComm · 2019Article
- Novel ureidopropanamide based N-formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPR2) agonists with potential application for central nervous system disorders characterized by neuroinflammation.European journal of medicinal chemistry · 2017Article
- Article
- The Formyl Peptide Receptors: Diversity of Ligands and Mechanism for Recognition.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- Synthesis of Five- and Six-Membered N-Phenylacetamido Substituted Heterocycles as Formyl Peptide Receptor Agonists.Drug development research · 2017Article
- 2-Arylacetamido-4-phenylamino-5-substituted pyridazinones as formyl peptide receptors agonists.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry · 2016Article
- Novel 3-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-[3-(4-methoxyphenyl)ureido]propanamides as selective agonists of human formyl-peptide receptor 2.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry · 2015Article
- Recognition of bacterial signal peptides by mammalian formyl peptide receptors: a new mechanism for sensing pathogens.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2015Article
- ML-18 is a non-peptide bombesin receptor subtype-3 antagonist which inhibits lung cancer growth.Peptides · 2015Article
- Antagonism of human formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) by chromones and related isoflavones.Biochemical pharmacology · 2014Article
- Development of small molecule non-peptide formyl peptide receptor (FPR) ligands and molecular modeling of their recognition.Current medicinal chemistry · 2014Review
- Further studies on 2-arylacetamide pyridazin-3(2H)-ones: design, synthesis and evaluation of 4,6-disubstituted analogs as formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) agonists.European journal of medicinal chemistry · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
N-formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that play critical roles in inflammatory reactions, and FPR-specific interactions can possibly be used to facilitate the resolution of pathological inflammatory reactions. Recent studies indicated that FPRs have stereo-selective preference for chiral ligands. Here, we investigated the structure-activity relationship of 24 chiral ureidopropanamides, including previously reported compounds PD168368/PD176252 and their close analogs, and used molecular modeling to define chiral recognition by FPR2. Unlike previously reported 6-methyl-2,4-disubstituted pyridazin-3(2H)-ones, whose R-forms preferentially activated FPR1/FPR2, we found that four S-enantiomers in the seven ureidopropanamide pairs tested preferentially activated intracellular Ca(2+) flux in FPR2-transfected cells, while the R-counterpart was more active in two enantiomer pairs. Thus, active enantiomers of FPR2 agonists can be in either R- or S-configurations, depending on the molecular scaffold and specific substituents at the chiral center. Using molecular modeling approaches, including field point methodology, homology modeling, and docking studies, we propose a model that can explain stereoselective activity of chiral FPR2 agonists. Importantly, our docking studies of FPR2 chiral agonists correlated well with the FPR2 pharmacophore model derived previously. We conclude that the ability of FPR2 to discriminate between the enantiomers is the consequence of the arrangement of the three asymmetric hydrophobic subpockets at the main orthosteric FPR2 binding site with specific orientation of charged regions in the subpockets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.