Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23219934›Full record

ArticleBiochemical pharmacology2013

3-(1H-indol-3-yl)-2-[3-(4-nitrophenyl)ureido]propanamide enantiomers with human formyl-peptide receptor agonist activity: molecular modeling of chiral recognition by FPR2.

Igor A Schepetkin, Liliya N Kirpotina, Andrei I Khlebnikov, Marcello Leopoldo, Ermelinda Lucente, Enza Lacivita, Paola De Giorgio, Mark T Quinn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Igor A SchepetkinDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.
Liliya N Kirpotina
Andrei I Khlebnikov
Marcello Leopoldo
Ermelinda Lucente
Enza Lacivita
Paola De Giorgio
Mark T Quinn
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITMontana State University · USAltai State Technical University · RU

Funding

Pilot Grants ProgramP30GM110732 · NIGMS · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI JUTILA, MARK A · 2014 to 2018
$5.4M
Center for Zoonotic and Emerging Infectious DiseasesP20GM103500 · NIGMS · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI QUINN, MARK T · 2012 to 2013
$4.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM103500NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103500NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM110732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

N-formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that play critical roles in inflammatory reactions, and FPR-specific interactions can possibly be used to facilitate the resolution of pathological inflammatory reactions. Recent studies indicated that FPRs have stereo-selective preference for chiral ligands. Here, we investigated the structure-activity relationship of 24 chiral ureidopropanamides, including previously reported compounds PD168368/PD176252 and their close analogs, and used molecular modeling to define chiral recognition by FPR2. Unlike previously reported 6-methyl-2,4-disubstituted pyridazin-3(2H)-ones, whose R-forms preferentially activated FPR1/FPR2, we found that four S-enantiomers in the seven ureidopropanamide pairs tested preferentially activated intracellular Ca(2+) flux in FPR2-transfected cells, while the R-counterpart was more active in two enantiomer pairs. Thus, active enantiomers of FPR2 agonists can be in either R- or S-configurations, depending on the molecular scaffold and specific substituents at the chiral center. Using molecular modeling approaches, including field point methodology, homology modeling, and docking studies, we propose a model that can explain stereoselective activity of chiral FPR2 agonists. Importantly, our docking studies of FPR2 chiral agonists correlated well with the FPR2 pharmacophore model derived previously. We conclude that the ability of FPR2 to discriminate between the enantiomers is the consequence of the arrangement of the three asymmetric hydrophobic subpockets at the main orthosteric FPR2 binding site with specific orientation of charged regions in the subpockets.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCalcium SignalingCatalytic DomainCells, CulturedHL-60 CellsHumansIndolesModels, MolecularNeutrophilsPyridinesReceptors, BombesinReceptors, Formyl PeptideReceptors, LipoxinStereoisomerismStructure-Activity RelationshipAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalFPR1 protein, humanFPR2 protein, humanIndolesPD 168368PD 176252PyridinesReceptors, BombesinReceptors, Formyl PeptideReceptors, Lipoxin

Identifiers

PMID23219934
PMCPMC3553303
OpenAlexW2052852012

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.