Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23317811›Full record

ReviewTrends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM2013

Obesity surgery: happy with less or eternally hungry?

Andrew C Shin, Hans-Rudolf Berthoud

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Metabolic vs. hedonic obesity: a conceptual distinction and its clinical implications.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2015
    Review
  9. Appetite and body weight regulation after bariatric surgery.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2015
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew C ShinNeurobiology of Nutrition Laboratory, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA.
Hans-Rudolf Berthoud
Louisiana State University System · US

Funding

Neural mechanisms controlling food intake and body weight after bariatric surgeryR01DK047348 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI BERTHOUD, HANS-RUDOLF · 1994 to 2018
$5.0M
Non-Homeostatic Neural Controls of Food IntakeR01DK071082 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI BERTHOUD, HANS-RUDOLF · 2006 to 2010
$1.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK047348NIDDK NIH HHS DK071082NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK047348NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK071082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The superior efficacy of bariatric surgery compared with intensive medical treatment in reversing metabolic disease is now well accepted, but the critical mechanisms remain unknown. Unlike dieting, which triggers strong counter-regulatory responses such as hunger and craving, some obesity surgeries appear to permanently reset the level of defended body weight. Understanding the molecular mechanisms behind successful surgery would thus go a long way in developing future 'knifeless' treatment options. Major candidates include changes in gut-brain signaling by hormones, bile acids, and other still unidentified factors. By re-sensitizing homeostatic regulatory circuits in the hypothalamus and hedonic-motivational processing in corticolimbic systems to internal signals, bariatric surgery could thus lead to a state of being content with less.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryHumansHypothalamusModels, BiologicalObesity

Identifiers

PMID23317811
PMCPMC3565073
OpenAlexW2060130312

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.