Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23354978›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2013

Genetic variants associated with breast cancer risk for Ashkenazi Jewish women with strong family histories but no identifiable BRCA1/2 mutation.

Erica S Rinella, Yongzhao Shao, Lauren Yackowski, Sreemanta Pramanik, Ruth Oratz, Freya Schnabel, Saurav Guha, Charles LeDuc, Christopher L Campbell, Susan D Klugman and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Previous GWAS hits in relation to young-onset breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Surgery in the era of the 'omics revolution.The British journal of surgery · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Erica S RinellaDepartment of Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Yongzhao Shao
Lauren Yackowski
Sreemanta Pramanik
Ruth Oratz
Freya Schnabel
Saurav Guha
Charles LeDuc
Christopher L Campbell
Susan D Klugman
Mary Beth Terry
Ruby T Senie
Irene L Andrulis
Mary Daly
Esther M John
Daniel Roses
Wendy K Chung
Harry Ostrer
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USNYU Langone Health · USColumbia University · USNew York University · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USMontefiore Medical Center · USMount Sinai Hospital · CANational Environmental Engineering Research Institute · INStanford University · US

Funding

Vaccine FacilityP30CA016087 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MARK Reid PHILIPS · 1985 to 2026
$83.1M
METROPOLITAN NEW YORK REGISTRY OF BREAST CANCER FAMILIESU01CA069398 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI TERRY, MARY BETH · 1995 to 2010
$10.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016087NCI NIH HHS U01 CA069398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to establish genetic risk models is critical for early identification and optimal treatment of breast cancer. For such a model to gain clinical utility, more variants must be identified beyond those discovered in previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS). This is especially true for women at high risk because of family history, but without BRCA1/2 mutations. This study incorporates three datasets in a GWAS analysis of women with Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) homogeneous ancestry. Two independent discovery cohorts comprised 239 and 238 AJ women with invasive breast cancer or preinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ and strong family histories of breast cancer, but lacking the three BRCA1/2 founder mutations, along with 294 and 230 AJ controls, respectively. An independent, third cohort of 203 AJ cases with familial breast cancer history and 263 healthy controls of AJ women was used for validation. A total of 19 SNPs were identified as associated with familial breast cancer risk in AJ women. Among these SNPs, 13 were identified from a panel of 109 discovery SNPs, including an FGFR2 haplotype. In addition, six previously identified breast cancer GWAS SNPs were confirmed in this population. Seven of the 19 markers were significant in a multivariate predictive model of familial breast cancer in AJ women, three novel SNPs [rs17663555(5q13.2), rs566164(6q21), and rs11075884(16q22.2)], the FGFR2 haplotype, and three previously published SNPs [rs13387042(2q35), rs2046210(ESR1), and rs3112612(TOX3)], yielding moderate predictive power with an area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC (receiver-operator characteristic curve) of 0.74. Population-specific genetic variants in addition to variants shared with populations of European ancestry may improve breast cancer risk prediction among AJ women from high-risk families without founder BRCA1/2 mutations.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationGenome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdultAgedArea Under CurveBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleGenotypeHaplotypesHumansBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23354978
PMCPMC4072456
OpenAlexW1986570448

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.