Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23402223›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2013

Insights into the evolution of Darwin's finches from comparative analysis of the Geospiza magnirostris genome sequence.

Chris M Rands, Aaron Darling, Matthew Fujita, Lesheng Kong, Matthew T Webster, Céline Clabaut, Richard D Emes, Andreas Heger, Stephen Meader, Michael Brent Hawkins and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Stable recombination hotspots in birds.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2015
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Third Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2015.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The Genome 10K Project: a way forward.Annual review of animal biosciences · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Epigenetics and the evolution of Darwin's Finches.Genome biology and evolution · 2014
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Chris M RandsDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy, and Genetics, MRC Functional Genomics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PT, UK.
Aaron Darling
Matthew Fujita
Lesheng Kong
Matthew T Webster
Céline Clabaut
Richard D Emes
Andreas Heger
Stephen Meader
Michael Brent Hawkins
Michael B Eisen
Clotilde Teiling
Jason Affourtit
Benjamin Boese
Peter R Grant
Barbara Rosemary Grant
Jonathan A Eisen
Arhat Abzhanov
Chris P Ponting
University of Oxford · GBEnzo Life Sciences (United States) · USUniversity of California, Davis · USHarvard University · USPrinceton University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of Nottingham · GBUppsala University · SE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F007590/1Medical Research Council MC_U137761446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA classical example of repeated speciation coupled with ecological diversification is the evolution of 14 closely related species of Darwin's (Galápagos) finches (Thraupidae, Passeriformes). Their adaptive radiation in the Galápagos archipelago took place in the last 2-3 million years and some of the molecular mechanisms that led to their diversification are now being elucidated. Here we report evolutionary analyses of genome of the large ground finch, Geospiza magnirostris.

results13,291 protein-coding genes were predicted from a 991.0 Mb G. magnirostris genome assembly. We then defined gene orthology relationships and constructed whole genome alignments between the G. magnirostris and other vertebrate genomes. We estimate that 15% of genomic sequence is functionally constrained between G. magnirostris and zebra finch. Genic evolutionary rate comparisons indicate that similar selective pressures acted along the G. magnirostris and zebra finch lineages suggesting that historical effective population size values have been similar in both lineages. 21 otherwise highly conserved genes were identified that each show evidence for positive selection on amino acid changes in the Darwin's finch lineage. Two of these genes (Igf2r and Pou1f1) have been implicated in beak morphology changes in Darwin's finches. Five of 47 genes showing evidence of positive selection in early passerine evolution have cilia related functions, and may be examples of adaptively evolving reproductive proteins.

conclusionsThese results provide insights into past evolutionary processes that have shaped G. magnirostris genes and its genome, and provide the necessary foundation upon which to build population genomics resources that will shed light on more contemporaneous adaptive and non-adaptive processes that have contributed to the evolution of the Darwin's finches.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomicsAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsGenetics, PopulationModels, GeneticPasseriformesSequence Homology, Nucleic Acid

Identifiers

PMID23402223
PMCPMC3575239
OpenAlexW2159252300

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.