Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23404268›Full record

SynthesisDer Internist2013

[J curve: when lowering blood pressure becomes a hazard?].

J Slany

Abstract readEnglish AbstractMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Der Internist, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

J Slanyjoerg@slany.org
St. Joseph Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Very low diastolic blood pressure is known to be associated with increased cardiovascular risks. The risk of low systolic pressure, however, is disputed. This survey analyses the bulk of recent studies on this topic. In hypertensive individuals without comorbidity, neither a systolic nor a diastolic J curve could ever be detected. In contrast, in patients with coronary heart disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or left ventricular hypertrophy, most studies document diastolic pressure < 70 mmHg (range 60-80 mmHg) as well as systolic pressure < 120 mmHg (range 110-130 mmHg) to be associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Data on primary prevention of stroke are inconsistent. A large secondary prevention study found a higher risk of recurrent stroke in old patients (> 75 years) with an in-study systolic pressure < 120 mmHg. Because the majority of studies in hypertensive patients show the optimal blood pressure to be 130-140/70-80 mmHg with a trend to higher values in old patients, there is no need for further lowering. Further decline of hitherto controlled blood pressure should prompt screening for an occult disease.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsComorbidityDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansHypertensionHypotensionIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentStrokeSurvival AnalysisSurvival RateAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID23404268
OpenAlexW337505103

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.