Evidence mapPaperPMID 23440836Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013

Antenatal interventions for reducing weight in obese women for improving pregnancy outcome.

Christine M Furber, Linda McGowan, Peter Bower, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Siobhan Quenby, Tina Lavender

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Genetic and epigenetic catalysts in early-life programming of adult cardiometabolic disorders.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2014
    Review
  20. Preconception counseling for preventable risks.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christine M FurberSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. christine.furber@manchester.ac.uk.
Linda McGowan
Peter Bower
Evangelos Kontopantelis
Siobhan Quenby
Tina Lavender
University of Manchester · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Department of Health 10/4001/02Department of Health SRP/10/4001/02Medical Research Council MC_PC_13042Medical Research Council MR/K006665/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBeing obese and pregnant is associated with substantial risks for the mother and her child. Current weight management guidance for obese pregnant women is limited. The latest recommendations suggest that obese pregnant women should gain between 5.0 and 9.1 kg during the pregnancy period, and weight loss is discouraged. However, observational studies indicate that some obese pregnant women, especially those who are heavier, lose weight during pregnancy. Furthermore, some obese pregnant women may intentionally lose weight. The safety of weight loss when pregnant and obese is not substantiated; some observational studies suggest that risks associated with weight loss such as pre-eclampsia are improved, but others indicate that the incidence of small- for-gestational infants are increased. It is important to evaluate interventions that are designed to reduce weight in obese pregnant women so that the safety of weight loss during this period can be established.

objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of interventions that reduce weight in obese pregnant women. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 July 2012) and contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, 'quasi-random' studies and cluster-randomised trials comparing a weight-loss intervention with routine care or more than one weight loss intervention. Cross-over trials were not eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We identified no studies that met the inclusion criteria for this review. MAIN

resultsThere were no included trials. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere are no trials designed to reduce weight in obese pregnant women. Until the safety of weight loss in obese pregnant women can be established, there can be no practice recommendations for these women to intentionally lose weight during the pregnancy period. Further study is required to explore the potential benefits, or harm, of weight loss in pregnancy when obese before weight loss interventions in pregnancy can be designed. Qualitative research is also required to explore dietary habits of obese pregnant women, especially those who are morbidly obese.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomeWeight LossFemaleHumansObesityPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal Care

Identifiers

PMID23440836
PMCPMC11297397
OpenAlexW1489622204

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.