SynthesisHealth services research2013
Do clinical standards for diabetes care address excess risk for hypoglycemia in vulnerable patients? A systematic review.
Synthesis in Health services research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Food Insecurity and Hypoglycemia among Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Insulin or Sulfonylureas: The Diabetes & Aging Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Qualitative analysis of reasons for hospitalization for severe hypoglycemia among older adults with diabetes.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Approaches to Risk Assessment Among Older Patients With Diabetes.Current diabetes reports · 2019Review
- Provider Perspectives on Quality Payment Programs Targeting Diabetes in Primary Care Settings.Population health management · 2019Article
- Developing a culturally tailored multigenerational intervention to prevent and manage type 2 diabetes in American Indian families living in rural settings: Findings from a focus group study.Research in nursing & health · 2019Article
- Observational
- Food Insecurity and Diabetes in Developed Societies.Current diabetes reports · 2016Review
- Coadministration of co-trimoxazole with sulfonylureas: hypoglycemia events and pattern of use.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2015Article
- National estimates of insulin-related hypoglycemia and errors leading to emergency department visits and hospitalizations.JAMA internal medicine · 2014Article
- On decreasing inequality in health care in a cost-effective way.BMC health services research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether diabetes clinical standards consider increased hypoglycemia risk in vulnerable patients. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, the National Guidelines Clearinghouse, the National Quality Measures Clearinghouse, and supplemental sources. STUDY
designSystematic review of clinical standards (guidelines, quality metrics, or pay-for-performance programs) for glycemic control in adult diabetes patients. The primary outcome was discussion of increased risk for hypoglycemia in vulnerable populations. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
methodsManuscripts identified were abstracted by two independent reviewers using prespecified inclusion/exclusion criteria and a standardized abstraction form. PRINCIPAL
findingsWe screened 1,166 titles, and reviewed 220 manuscripts in full text. Forty-four guidelines, 17 quality metrics, and 8 pay-for-performance programs were included. Five (11 percent) guidelines and no quality metrics or pay-for-performance programs met the primary outcome.
conclusionsClinical standards do not substantively incorporate evidence about increased risk for hypoglycemia in vulnerable populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.