Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23449308›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2013

Targeting pathological B cell receptor signalling in lymphoid malignancies.

Ryan M Young, Louis M Staudt

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 199 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
199citing papers in PubMed
27.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

199 citing papers in PubMed, 395 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A multi-omics integrative analyses revealsFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

139 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan M YoungMetabolism Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Louis M Staudt
National Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Oncogenic mechanisms and molecular targets in lymphomaZIABC011008 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI STAUDT, LOUIS · 2009 to 2025
$21.0M
REGULATION OF GENE EXPRESSION IN NORMAL AND MALIGNANT HUMAN LYMPHOCYTESZ01SC004024 · SC · CLINICAL SCIENCES · PI STAUDT, LOUIS · 1996 to 2007
$4.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 SC004024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Signalling through the B cell receptor (BCR) is central to the development and maintenance of B cells. In light of the numerous proliferative and survival pathways activated downstream of the BCR, it comes as no surprise that malignant B cells would co-opt this receptor to promote their own growth and survival. However, direct evidence for BCR signalling in human lymphoma has only come to light recently. Roles for antigen-dependent and antigen-independent, or tonic, BCR signalling have now been described for several different lymphoma subtypes. Furthermore, correlative data implicate antigen-dependent BCR signalling in many other forms of lymphoma. A host of therapeutic agents targeting effectors of the BCR signalling pathway are now in clinical trials and have shown initial success against multiple forms of lymphoma.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsHumansLymphocytesLymphomaProtein-Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, Antigen, B-CellSignal TransductionAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, Antigen, B-Cell

Identifiers

PMID23449308
PMCPMC7595252
OpenAlexW2067257663

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.