Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23474973›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2013

Incremental impact of breast cancer SNP panel on risk classification in a screening population of white and African American women.

Anne Marie McCarthy, Katrina Armstrong, Elizabeth Handorf, Leigh Boghossian, Marisa Jones, Jinbo Chen, Mirar Bristol Demeter, Erin McGuire, Emily F Conant, Susan M Domchek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne Marie McCarthyPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Room 1009, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. annemcc@mail.med.upenn.edu
Katrina Armstrong
Elizabeth Handorf
Leigh Boghossian
Marisa Jones
Jinbo Chen
Mirar Bristol Demeter
Erin McGuire
Emily F Conant
Susan M Domchek
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Comparative Effectiveness in Genomic MedicineUC2CA148310 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ARMSTRONG, KATRINA · 2009 to 2010
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS RC2CA148310NCI NIH HHS UC2 CA148310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer risk prediction remains imperfect, particularly among non-white populations. This study examines the impact of including single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) alleles in risk prediction for white and African American women undergoing screening mammogram. Using a prospective cohort study, standard risk information and buccal swabs were collected at the time of screening mammography. A 12 SNP panel was performed by deCODE genetics. Five-year and lifetime risks incorporating SNPs were calculated by multiplying estimated Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BCRAT) risk by the total genetic risk ratio. Concordance between the BCRAT and the combined model (BCRAT + SNPs) in identifying high-risk women was measured using the kappa statistic. SNP data were available for 810 women (39 % African American, 55 % white). The mean BCRAT 5-year risk was 1.71 % for whites and 1.18 % for African Americans. Mean genetic risk ratios were 1.09 in whites and 1.29 in African Americans. Among whites, three SNPs had higher frequencies, and among African Americans, seven SNPs had higher and four had lower high-risk allele frequencies than previously reported. Agreement between the BCRAT and the combined model was relatively low for identifying high-risk women (5-year κ = 0.54, lifetime κ = 0.36). Addition of SNPs had the greatest effect among African Americans, with 12.4 % identified as having high-5-year risk by BCRAT, but 33 % by the combined model. A greater proportion of African Americans were reclassified as having high-5-year risk than whites using the combined model (21 vs. 10 %). The addition of SNPs to the BCRAT reclassifies the high-risk status of some women undergoing screening mammography, particularly African Americans. Further research is needed to determine the clinical validity and utility of the SNP panel for use in breast cancer risk prediction, particularly among African Americans for whom these risk alleles have generally not been validated.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseasePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdultBlack or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleGene FrequencyGenetic TestingHumansMammographyMiddle AgedPennsylvaniaProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentWhite People

Identifiers

PMID23474973
PMCPMC4000530
OpenAlexW2007488862

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.