ReviewCurrent vascular pharmacology2013
Microvascular obstruction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: pathogenesis, diagnosis and prognostic significance.
Review in Current vascular pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary goal in reopening an infarct-related artery is the restoration of myocardial tissue-level perfusion. In a variable proportion of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, however, microcirculatory impairment may persist after epicardial coronary artery recanalization. This phenomenon is known as microvascular obstruction (MVO). Ischemic injury, reperfusion injury, and distal embolization along with the individual response to each of these mechanisms are variably involved in the pathogenesis of MVO in the single patient. Importantly, MVO is associated with a worse prognosis both at short- and long-term follow-up. MVO can be assessed in the cath-lab by simple angiographic indexes, such as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade score and Myocardial Blush Grade, or by invasive measures of coronary flow pattern. Imaging techniques, such as myocardial contrast echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance, and ST-segment resolution on standard electrocardiogram are used in the days following reperfusion with the patient in the coronary care unit. In this article, we review the available data regarding pathogenesis, diagnosis and the prognostic significance of MVO after primary percurtaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients, with a brief highlighting on the crucial role of its prevention and its early detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23506502W2128313089What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.