Evidence mapPaperPMID 23506504Full record

ReviewCurrent vascular pharmacology2013

Myocardial no-reflow treatment.

Olivier Muller, Catalina Trana, Eric Eeckhout

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed
In one paragraph

Review in Current vascular pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02507128 (Effects of Glucagon Like Peptide-1 on No-reflow in Patients With ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02507128 naunknown statusstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Glucagon Like Peptide-1 on No-reflow in Patients With ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Ran2015Enrolled190Registered outcomes5Posted comparisons0ConditionsAcute ST-segment Elevation Myocardial InfarctionArmsliraglutide, Placebo
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olivier MullerCardiology department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Rue du Bugnon 21, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Catalina Trana
Eric Eeckhout
Hôpital Orthopédique de la Suisse Romande · CHUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No-reflow phenomenon is a consequence of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) which arises most of the time in the setting of myocardial infarction, but can be also the consequence of PCI in stable angina patients (rotatablator ablation technique or angioplasty in saphenous vein grafts). In this review, we summarize two ways of treating the no-reflow according to the current literature. First through the pharmacological approach where several compounds have been assessed like adenosine, nitroprusside, verapamil, nicorandil, dipyridamole, epinephrine or cyclosporine. Second through the mechanical approach where few strategies have been examined like intra-aortic balloon pumping or postconditioning. Finally, we provide an algorithm for treating a no-reflow even though no studies showed a beneficial effect in terms of clinical endpoints.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiovascular AgentsHumansIschemic PostconditioningMyocardial InfarctionNo-Reflow PhenomenonTreatment OutcomeCardiovascular Agents

Identifiers

PMID23506504
OpenAlexW2048755867

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.