Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23535826›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2013

Helicobacter Pylori "Test-and-Treat" Strategy for Management of Dyspepsia: A Comprehensive Review.

Javier P Gisbert, Xavier Calvet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. First regional consensus on the management ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Acid peptic disorder compass: An Indian expert consensus on comprehensive management.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Clinical Pathologic Profiles ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Clinical evaluation of a real-time PCR assay for diagnosis ofInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2024
    Article
  11. Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Helicobacter pylori infection.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  14. The impact ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Diagnostic Challenges ofCanadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Article
  17. Empirical vs. Susceptibility-Guided Treatment ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Javier P GisbertGastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IP) and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain.
Xavier Calvet
Hospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDeciding on whether the Helicobacter pylori test-and-treat strategy is an appropriate diagnostic-therapeutic approach for patients with dyspepsia invites a series of questions. The aim present article addresses the test-and-treat strategy and attempts to provide practical conclusions for the clinician who diagnoses and treats patients with dyspepsia.

methodsBibliographical searches were performed in MEDLINE using the keywords Helicobacter pylori, test-and-treat, and dyspepsia. We focused mainly on data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, meta-analyses, cost-effectiveness analyses, and decision analyses.

resultsSeveral prospective studies and decision analyses support the use of the test-and-treat strategy, although we must be cautious when extrapolating the results from one geographical area to another. Many factors determine whether this strategy is appropriate in each particular area. The test-and-treat strategy will cure most cases of underlying peptic ulcer disease, prevent most potential cases of gastroduodenal disease, and yield symptomatic benefit in a minority of patients with functional dyspepsia. Future studies should be able to stratify dyspeptic patients according to their likelihood of improving after treatment of infection by H. pylori.

conclusionsThe test-and-treat strategy will cure most cases of underlying peptic ulcer disease and prevent most potential cases of gastroduodenal disease. In addition, a minority of infected patients with functional dyspepsia will gain symptomatic benefit. Several prospective studies and decision analyses support the use of the test-and-treat strategy. The test-and-treat strategy is being reinforced by the accumulating data that support the increasingly accepted idea that "the only good H. pylori is a dead H. pylori".

Identifiers

PMID23535826
PMCPMC3616453
OpenAlexW1984984931

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.