ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2013
The branch-site test of positive selection is surprisingly robust but lacks power under synonymous substitution saturation and variation in GC.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
100 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complex History of Organellar Introgression inEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Inter-individual gene expression variability implies stable regulation of brain-biased genes across organs in three ray-finned fishes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Lectin Gene Families in Three Phaseolus Species: Genome-Wide Identification, Evolutionary Analysis, Pleiotropic Effect, and Regulation Under Multiple Stress Conditions.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Article
- Evolutionary patterns in squamate mitogenomes: Are selective regimes associated with fossoriality and limblessness?Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Unveiling the functional fate of duplicated genes through expression profiling and structural analysis.Genome research · 2025Article
- Evolutionary diversification of ancestral genes across vertebrates and insects.Genome biology · 2025Article
- The Evolutionary History and Modern Diversity of Triterpenoid Cyclases.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Shifts in bee diet breadths are associated with gene gains and losses and positive selection across olfactory receptors.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- The evolutionary history and modern diversity of triterpenoid cyclases.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Do the "big four" orders of insects comprise evolutionarily significant higher taxa with coherent patterns of selection on protein-coding genes?Evolution letters · 2025Article
- Article
- Evolution of a biological thermocouple by adaptation of cytochrome c oxidase in a subterrestrial metazoan, Halicephalobus mephisto.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Complete chloroplast genomes of eight Delphinium taxa (Ranunculaceae) endemic to Xinjiang, China: insights into genome structure, comparative analysis, and phylogenetic relationships.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Evolution of a biological thermocouple by adaptation of cytochrome c oxidase in a subterrestrial metazoan.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- AlexandrusPS: A User-Friendly Pipeline for the Automated Detection of Orthologous Gene Clusters and Subsequent Positive Selection Analysis.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Relaxation of Natural Selection in the Evolution of the Giant Lungfish Genomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Adaptive Selection in the Evolution of Aquaglyceroporins in Mammals.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023Article
- Characterization of large-scale genomic differences in the first complete human genome.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Duplication and Losses of Opsin Genes in Lophotrochozoan Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Repeated evolution of similar phenotypes: Integrating comparative methods with developmental pathways.Genetics and molecular biology · 2023Article
40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Positive selection is widely estimated from protein coding sequence alignments by the nonsynonymous-to-synonymous ratio ω. Increasingly elaborate codon models are used in a likelihood framework for this estimation. Although there is widespread concern about the robustness of the estimation of the ω ratio, more efforts are needed to estimate this robustness, especially in the context of complex models. Here, we focused on the branch-site codon model. We investigated its robustness on a large set of simulated data. First, we investigated the impact of sequence divergence. We found evidence of underestimation of the synonymous substitution rate for values as small as 0.5, with a slight increase in false positives for the branch-site test. When dS increases further, underestimation of dS is worse, but false positives decrease. Interestingly, the detection of true positives follows a similar distribution, with a maximum for intermediary values of dS. Thus, high dS is more of a concern for a loss of power (false negatives) than for false positives of the test. Second, we investigated the impact of GC content. We showed that there is no significant difference of false positives between high GC (up to ∼80%) and low GC (∼30%) genes. Moreover, neither shifts of GC content on a specific branch nor major shifts in GC along the gene sequence generate many false positives. Our results confirm that the branch-site is a very conservative test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.