Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23579629›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2014

Protein-protein interactions: switch from classical methods to proteomics and bioinformatics-based approaches.

Armand G Ngounou Wetie, Izabela Sokolowska, Alisa G Woods, Urmi Roy, Katrin Deinhardt, Costel C Darie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Direct Quantification of Protein-Protein Interactions in Living Bacterial Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. ACS omega · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Investigating Protein-Protein Interactions of Autophagy-Involved TNIP1.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  11. Identification of Virus-Host Protein Interactions Via Proteomic Techniques.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Recent advances and challenges in protein complex model accuracy estimation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Armand G Ngounou WetieDepartment of Chemistry and Biomolecular Science, Biochemistry and Proteomics Group, Clarkson University, 8 Clarkson Avenue, Potsdam, NY, 13699-5810, USA.
Izabela Sokolowska
Alisa G Woods
Urmi Roy
Katrin Deinhardt
Costel C Darie

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the sequencing of the human genome and many other organisms, research on protein-coding genes and their functions (functional genomics) has intensified. Subsequently, with the observation that proteins are indeed the molecular effectors of most cellular processes, the discipline of proteomics was born. Clearly, proteins do not function as single entities but rather as a dynamic network of team players that have to communicate. Though genetic (yeast two-hybrid Y2H) and biochemical methods (co-immunoprecipitation Co-IP, affinity purification AP) were the methods of choice at the beginning of the study of protein-protein interactions (PPI), in more recent years there has been a shift towards proteomics-based methods and bioinformatics-based approaches. In this review, we first describe in depth PPIs and we make a strong case as to why unraveling the interactome is the next challenge in the field of proteomics. Furthermore, classical methods of investigation of PPIs and structure-based bioinformatics approaches are presented. The greatest emphasis is placed on proteomic methods, especially native techniques that were recently developed and that have been shown to be reliable. Finally, we point out the limitations of these methods and the need to set up a standard for the validation of PPI experiments.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction MappingProteomicsAnimalsComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualHumansNerve Tissue ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTwo-Hybrid System TechniquesNerve Tissue ProteinsPDF protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23579629
PMCPMC11113707

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.