Trial reportThe British journal of nutrition2013
The effect of intermittent energy and carbohydrate restriction v. daily energy restriction on weight loss and metabolic disease risk markers in overweight women.
Trial report in The British journal of nutrition, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 220 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Intermittent Energy Restriction Using Meal Replacements in Overweight Chinese Subjects: a Pilot Randomized Control Trial
A Randomised Controlled Trial Assessing The Impact Of An Intermittent Energy Restricted Diet On Weight Loss, Insulin Sensitivity and Heart Rate Variability In Men and Women With Central Obesity
Obesity, Body Fat Distribution, and Cancer Risk in the Multiethnic Cohort Study
Time Restricted Eating As Treatment (TREAT) for Diabetes Mellitus: A Pre-Post 12 Week Study on the Effectiveness of Intermittent Fasting in Asians With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Effectiveness of Intermittent Fasting Compared to Continuous Energy Restriction on Body Weight Loss Among Overweight/Obese Adults: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
220 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The effects of intermittent fasting on BMI, fasting blood glucose, and blood pressure in women with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis with dose-response relationships.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Intermittent Fasting for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Risks: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Current nutrition reports · 2025Pooled it
- Intermittent fasting strategies and their effects on body weight and other cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of different types of intermittent fasting on metabolic outcomes: an umbrella review and network meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Comparing caloric restriction regimens for effective weight management in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of Intermittent Energy Restriction Compared with Those of Continuous Energy Restriction on Body Composition and Cardiometabolic Risk Markers - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Adults.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Pooled it
- Scientific landscape of oxidative stress in sarcopenia: from bibliometric analysis to hotspots review.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- The Effect of Intermittent Fasting on Appetite: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effects of Intermittent Fasting in Human Compared to a Non-intervention Diet and Caloric Restriction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Pooled it
- Effectiveness of an intermittent fasting diet versus continuous energy restriction on anthropometric measurements, body composition and lipid profile in overweight and obese adults: a meta-analysis.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2021Pooled it
- Intermittent fasting for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Effect of Epidemic Intermittent Fasting on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Pooled it
- Effects of Ramadan and Non-ramadan Intermittent Fasting on Body Composition: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2020Pooled it
- Intermittent versus continuous energy restriction on weight loss and cardiometabolic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of translational medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Comprehensive Lipid Response to Dietary Interventions in Overweight and Obese Women.Nutrients · 2026Trial
- The Effects of Continuous vs. Intermittent Caloric Restriction on Fat Loss: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Nutrients · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Thyroid axis adaptations to moderate short-term energy restriction in healthy, young women.European journal of endocrinology · 2025Trial
160 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by[Not Available].2016
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intermittent energy restriction may result in greater improvements in insulin sensitivity and weight control than daily energy restriction (DER). We tested two intermittent energy and carbohydrate restriction (IECR) regimens, including one which allowed ad libitum protein and fat (IECR+PF). Overweight women (n 115) aged 20 and 69 years with a family history of breast cancer were randomised to an overall 25 % energy restriction, either as an IECR (2500-2717 kJ/d, < 40 g carbohydrate/d for 2 d/week) or a 25 % DER (approximately 6000 kJ/d for 7 d/week) or an IECR+PF for a 3-month weight-loss period and 1 month of weight maintenance (IECR or IECR+PF for 1 d/week). Insulin resistance reduced with the IECR diets (mean - 0·34 (95% CI - 0·66, - 0·02) units) and the IECR+PF diet (mean - 0·38 (95% CI - 0·75, - 0·01) units). Reductions with the IECR diets were significantly greater compared with the DER diet (mean 0·2 (95% CI - 0·19, 0·66) μU/unit, P= 0·02). Both IECR groups had greater reductions in body fat compared with the DER group (IECR: mean - 3·7 (95% CI - 2·5, - 4·9) kg, P= 0·007; IECR+PF: mean - 3·7 (95% CI - 2·8, - 4·7) kg, P= 0·019; DER: mean - 2·0 (95% CI - 1·0, 3·0) kg). During the weight maintenance phase, 1 d of IECR or IECR+PF per week maintained the reductions in insulin resistance and weight. In the short term, IECR is superior to DER with respect to improved insulin sensitivity and body fat reduction. Longer-term studies into the safety and effectiveness of IECR diets are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.