Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23604584›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2013

Comparison between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: a meta-analysis.

Sen Wang, Ping Li, Xiao Fang Sun, Nian Yuan Ye, Ze Kuan Xu, Daorong Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Adjustable gastric band surgery or medical management in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity: three-year results of a randomized trial.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2019
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. How to Choose the Best Metabolic Procedure?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. [Procedure selection and technique of metabolic surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sen WangCollege of Basic Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, People's Republic of China.
Ping Li
Xiao Fang Sun
Nian Yuan Ye
Ze Kuan Xu
Daorong Wang
Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital · CNNanjing Medical University · CNYangzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bariatric surgery is now widely accepted for treatment of morbid obesity. This study compared the effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) on excess weight loss (EWL) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). PubMed and Embase were searched for publications concerning LAGB and LSG from 2000 to 2012, with the last search on August 17, 2012. EWL and T2DM improvement over 6 and 12 months were pooled and compared by meta-analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences were calculated with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Eleven studies involving 1,004 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with LAGB, LSG achieved greater EWL. The mean percentage EWL for LAGB was 33.9 % after 6 months in six studies and 37.8 % after 12 months in four studies; for LSG, EWL was 50.6 % after 6 months and 51.8 % after 12 months in the same studies. LSG was also superior to LAGB in treating T2DM. In five studies, T2DM was improved in 42 of 68 (61.8 %) patients after LAGB and 66 of 80 (82.5 %) after LSG, representing a pooled OR of 0.34 (95 % CI 0.16-0.73) and pooled mean differences of -12.55 (95 % CI -15.66 to -9.43) and -4.97 (95 % CI -7.58 to -8.36), respectively. LSG is more effective than LAGB in morbid obesity, with higher percentage EWL and greater improvement in T2DM.

Indexed as

GastrectomyGastroplastyLaparoscopyWeight LossBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansMaleObesity, MorbidOdds RatioTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23604584
PMCPMC3671102
OpenAlexW2044027773

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.