Evidence mapPaperPMID 23633415Full record

ArticleBMJ open2013

Real-world outcomes of US employees with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with insulin glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin: a comparative retrospective database study.

Li Wang, Wenhui Wei, Raymond Miao, Lin Xie, Onur Baser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A Systematic Review of Insulin Adherence Measures in Patients with Diabetes.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Average lost work productivity due to non-fatal injuries by type in the USA.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2021
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Persistence with IDegLira in Patients in Clinical Practice: A Nationwide Observational Study in Sweden.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020
    Article
  8. Basal Insulin Initiation and Maintenance in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the United States.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2020
    Article
  9. Injectable Antihyperglycemics: A Systematic Review and Critical Analysis of the Literature on Adherence, Persistence, and Health Outcomes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2019
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Persistence with Insulin Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in France: An Insurance Claims Study.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2016
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Li WangSTATinMED Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Wenhui Wei
Raymond Miao
Lin Xie
Onur Baser
Sanofi (United States) · USSTATinMED (United States) · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare real-world outcomes of initiating insulin glargine (GLA) versus neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin among employees with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who had both employer-sponsored health insurance and short-tem-disability coverages.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingMarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters/Health and Productivity Management Databases 2003-2009.

participantsAdult employees with T2DM who were previously treated with oral antidiabetic drugs and/or glucagon-like-peptide 1 receptor agonists and initiated GLA or NPH were included if they were continuously enrolled in healthcare and short-term-disability coverages for 3 months before (baseline) and 1 year after (follow-up) initiation. Treatment selection bias was addressed by 2:1 propensity score matching. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using different matching ratios. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes during 1-year follow-up were measured and compared: insulin treatment persistence and adherence; hypoglycaemia rates and daily average consumption of insulin; total and diabetes-specific healthcare resource utilisation and costs and loss in productivity, as measured by short-term disability, and the associated costs.

resultsA total of 534 patients were matched and analysed (GLA: 356; NPH 178) with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. GLA patients were more persistent and adherent (both p<0.05), had lower rates of hospitalisation (23% vs 31.4%; p=0.036) and endocrinologist visits (19.1% vs 26.9%; p=0.038), similar hypoglycaemia rates (both 4.4%; p=1.0), higher diabetes drug costs ($2031 vs $1522; p<0.001), but similar total healthcare costs ($14 550 vs $16 093; p=0.448) and total diabetes-related healthcare costs ($4686 vs $5604; p=0.416). Short-term disability days and costs were numerically lower in the GLA cohort (16.0 vs 24.5 days; p=0.086 and $2824 vs $4363; p=0.081, respectively). Sensitivity analyses yielded similar findings.

conclusionsInsulin GLA results in better persistence and adherence, compared with NPH insulin, with no overall cost disadvantages. Better persistence and adherence may lead to long-term health benefits for employees with T2DM.

Identifiers

PMID23633415
PMCPMC3641450
OpenAlexW2113319715

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.