Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23675788›Full record

Trial reportJournal of athletic training

A 3-month jump-landing training program: a feasibility study using the RE-AIM framework.

Inne Aerts, Elke Cumps, Evert Verhagen, Niels Mathieu, Sander Van Schuerbeeck, Romain Meeusen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of athletic training. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Inne AertsVrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
Elke Cumps
Evert Verhagen
Niels Mathieu
Sander Van Schuerbeeck
Romain Meeusen
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BESOMT University of Physiotherapy · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextEvaluating the translatability and feasibility of an intervention program has become as important as determining the effectiveness of the intervention.

objectiveTo evaluate the applicability of a 3-month jump-landing training program in basketball players, using the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) framework.

designRandomized controlled trial.

settingNational and regional basketball teams. PATIENTS OR OTHER

participantsTwenty-four teams of the second highest national division and regional basketball divisions in Flanders, Belgium, were randomly assigned (1:1) to a control group and intervention group. A total of 243 athletes (control group = 129, intervention group = 114), ages 15 to 41 years, volunteered. INTERVENTION(S): All exercises in the intervention program followed a progressive development, emphasizing lower extremity alignment during jump-landing activities. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The results of the process evaluation of the intervention program were based on the 5 dimensions of the RE-AIM framework. The injury incidence density, hazard ratios, and 95% confidence intervals were determined.

resultsThe participation rate of the total sample was 100% (reach). The hazard ratio was different between the intervention group and the control group (0.40 [95% confidence interval = 0.16, 0.99]; effectiveness). Of the 12 teams in the intervention group, 8 teams (66.7%) agreed to participate in the study (adoption). Eight of the participating coaches (66.7%) felt positively about the intervention program and stated that they had implemented the training sessions of the program as intended (implementation). All coaches except 1 (87.5%) intended to continue the intervention program the next season (maintenance).

conclusionsCompliance of the coaches in this coach-supervised jump-landing training program was high. In addition, the program was effective in preventing lower extremity injuries.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAthletic InjuriesBasketballBelgiumConfidence IntervalsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLeg InjuriesMaleOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePhysical Education and TrainingPrevalenceProportional Hazards ModelsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID23675788
PMCPMC3655742
OpenAlexW1981128056

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.