Trial reportImplementation science : IS2013
Systems intervention to promote colon cancer screening in safety net settings: protocol for a community-based participatory randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01299493 (Systems Intervention to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening/ Program for the Elimination of Cancer Disparities), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Systems Intervention to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening/ Program for the Elimination of Cancer Disparities
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Fidelity to and comparative results across behavioral interventions evaluated through the RE-AIM framework: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Does increased implementation support improve community clinics' guideline-concordant care? Results of a mixed methods, pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial.Implementation science : IS · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Feasibility and impact of implementing a private care system's diabetes quality improvement intervention in the safety net: a cluster-randomized trial.Implementation science : IS · 2015 · on this mapTrial
- A Multilateral Qualitative Study of Perspectives on Enhancing Clinical Trial Diversity Among Historically Underrepresented Groups.Clinical therapeutics · 2025Article
- Selecting the optimal longitudinal cluster randomized design with a continuous outcome: Parallel-arm, crossover, or stepped-wedge.Statistical methods in medical research · 2025Article
- Methods for community-engaged data collection and analysis in implementation research.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- An overview of optimal designs under a given budget in cluster randomized trials with a binary outcome.Statistical methods in medical research · 2023Review
- A Novel Process to Recruit and Select Community Partners for a Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Study.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2023Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Colorectal Cancer Screening in African-American Men.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Article
- Sample size calculation in three-level cluster randomized trials using generalized estimating equation models.Statistics in medicine · 2020Article
- Optimal designs in three-level cluster randomized trials with a binary outcome.Statistics in medicine · 2019Article
- Patients' self-reported barriers to colon cancer screening in federally qualified health center settings.Preventive medicine reports · 2019Article
- Utilizing Community-based Participatory Research Principles in a Safety-Net Hospital to Develop a Research Partnership.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2019Article
- Conducting a randomized trial in rural and urban safety-net health centers: Added value of community-based participatory research.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2018Article
- Sickle cell disease and implementation science: A partnership to accelerate advances.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2017Review
- How to improve colon cancer screening rates.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2015Review
- Community engagement in dissemination and implementation models: A narrative review.Implementation research and practiceReview
- Recruiting and retaining service agencies and public health providers in longitudinal studies: Implications for community-engaged implementation research.Methodological innovationsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality. Screening can be effective but is underutilized. System- or multi-level interventions could be effective at increasing screening, but most have been implemented and evaluated in higher-resource settings such as health maintenance organizations. Given the disparities evident for colorectal cancer and the potential for screening to improve outcomes, there is a need to expand this work to include diverse settings, including those who treat economically disadvantaged patients. This paper describes the study protocol for a trial designed to increase colorectal cancer screening in those 'safety-net' health centers that serve underinsured and uninsured patients. This trial was designed and is being implemented using a community-based participatory approach. METHODS/
designWe developed a practical clinical cluster-randomized controlled trial. We will recruit 16 community health centers to this trial. This systems-level intervention consists of a menu of evidence-based implementation strategies for increasing colorectal cancer screening. Health centers in the intervention arm then collaborate with the study team to tailor strategies to their own setting in order to maximize fit and acceptability. Data are collected at the organizational level through interviews, and at the provider and patient levels through surveys. Patients complete a survey about their healthcare and screening utilization at baseline, six months, and twelve months. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is colorectal cancer screening by patient self-report, supplemented by a chart-audit in a subsample of patients. Implementation outcomes informed by the Reach, Efficacy/Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) conceptual framework will be measured at patient, provider, and practice levels. DISCUSSION: Our study is one of the first to integrate community participatory strategies to a randomized controlled trial in a healthcare setting. The multi-level approach will support the ability of the intervention to affect screening through multiple avenues. The participatory approach will strengthen the chance that implementation strategies will be maintained after study completion and, supports external validity by increasing health center interest and willingness to participate.
trial registrationNCT01299493.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.