Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23731594›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2013

Systems intervention to promote colon cancer screening in safety net settings: protocol for a community-based participatory randomized controlled trial.

Aimee S James, Veronica Richardson, Jean S Wang, Enola K Proctor, Graham A Colditz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01299493 (Systems Intervention to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening/ Program for the Elimination of Cancer Disparities), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01299493 nacompletednot on this map

Systems Intervention to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening/ Program for the Elimination of Cancer Disparities

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2012 to 2017Enrolled490ConditionsCarcinomaArmsSystems-level intervention to promote colon cancer screening
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A Novel Process to Recruit and Select Community Partners for a Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Study.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. How to improve colon cancer screening rates.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2015
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aimee S JamesDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8100, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. jamesai@wudosis.wustl.edu
Veronica Richardson
Jean S Wang
Enola K Proctor
Graham A Colditz

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Training ProgramU54CA153460 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2010 to 2015
$5.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCATS NIH HHS UL TR000448NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153460NCI NIH HHS U54CA153460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality. Screening can be effective but is underutilized. System- or multi-level interventions could be effective at increasing screening, but most have been implemented and evaluated in higher-resource settings such as health maintenance organizations. Given the disparities evident for colorectal cancer and the potential for screening to improve outcomes, there is a need to expand this work to include diverse settings, including those who treat economically disadvantaged patients. This paper describes the study protocol for a trial designed to increase colorectal cancer screening in those 'safety-net' health centers that serve underinsured and uninsured patients. This trial was designed and is being implemented using a community-based participatory approach. METHODS/

designWe developed a practical clinical cluster-randomized controlled trial. We will recruit 16 community health centers to this trial. This systems-level intervention consists of a menu of evidence-based implementation strategies for increasing colorectal cancer screening. Health centers in the intervention arm then collaborate with the study team to tailor strategies to their own setting in order to maximize fit and acceptability. Data are collected at the organizational level through interviews, and at the provider and patient levels through surveys. Patients complete a survey about their healthcare and screening utilization at baseline, six months, and twelve months. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is colorectal cancer screening by patient self-report, supplemented by a chart-audit in a subsample of patients. Implementation outcomes informed by the Reach, Efficacy/Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) conceptual framework will be measured at patient, provider, and practice levels. DISCUSSION: Our study is one of the first to integrate community participatory strategies to a randomized controlled trial in a healthcare setting. The multi-level approach will support the ability of the intervention to affect screening through multiple avenues. The participatory approach will strengthen the chance that implementation strategies will be maintained after study completion and, supports external validity by increasing health center interest and willingness to participate.

trial registrationNCT01299493.

Indexed as

AgedClinical ProtocolsCluster AnalysisColonic NeoplasmsCommunity Health ServicesEarly Detection of CancerEvidence-Based MedicineHealth PromotionHumansMiddle AgedPatient Selection

Identifiers

PMID23731594
PMCPMC3674918

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.