ArticleBMJ open2013
Telemonitoring-based service redesign for the management of uncontrolled hypertension (HITS): cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Coordinated PCP-Cardiologist Telemedicine Model (PCTM) in China's Community Hypertension Care: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Seniors Guardian: A Non-intrusive Monitoring Platform for Activities of Daily Living Amongst the Elderly
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Economics of Team-Based Care for Blood Pressure Control: Updated Community Guide Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Consumer Devices for Patient-Generated Health Data Using Blood Pressure Monitors for Managing Hypertension: Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring With Support: Intervention Effectiveness and Cost.American journal of preventive medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Economic evaluation of the utilization of telemedicine for patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review.Heart failure reviews · 2020Pooled it
- The Effectiveness of Self-Management of Hypertension in Adults Using Mobile Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Pooled it
- Economics of Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Community Guide Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Standard vs Enhanced Self-measurement of Blood Pressure Paired With a Connected Smartphone Application: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2022Trial
- Home and Online Management and Evaluation of Blood Pressure (HOME BP) using a digital intervention in poorly controlled hypertension: randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness of Telemonitoring and Self-Monitoring of Blood Pressure for Antihypertensive Titration in Primary Care (TASMINH4).Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Home BP monitoring using a telemonitoring system is effective for controlling BP in a remote island in Japan.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2014Trial
- Impact of telehealth on general practice contacts: findings from the whole systems demonstrator cluster randomised trial.BMC health services research · 2013Trial
- Telemonitoring based service redesign for the management of uncontrolled hypertension: multicentre randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2013Trial
- Effectiveness of a nationwide community pharmacist-led program promoting home blood pressure monitoring on hypertension control and self-management.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Observational
- Prerequisites for Cost-Effective Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring: Early Health Economic Analysis.JMIR cardio · 2025Article
- A decision-analytic method to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of remote monitoring technology for chronic depression.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- Enabling scale and spread of technology-enabled remote monitoring of blood pressure at home: findings from a rapid qualitative evaluation.NIHR open research · 2025Article
- Feasibility of in-home monitoring for people with glaucoma: the I-TRAC mixed-methods study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Article
- Telehealth use during the early COVID-19 public health emergency and subsequent health care costs and utilization.Health affairs scholar · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the costs and cost-effectiveness of managing patients with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) using telemonitoring versus usual care from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS).
designWithin trial post hoc economic evaluation of data from a pragmatic randomised controlled trial using an intention-to-treat approach.
setting20 socioeconomically diverse general practices in Lothian, Scotland.
participants401 primary care patients aged 29-95 with uncontrolled daytime ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) (≥135/85, but <210/135 mm Hg).
interventionParticipants were centrally randomised to 6 months of a telemonitoring service comprising of self-monitoring of BP transmitted to a secure website for review by the attending nurse/doctor and patient, with optional automated patient decision-support by text/email (n=200) or usual care (n-201). Randomisation was undertaken with minimisation for age, sex, family practice, use of three or more hypertension drugs and self-monitoring history.
main outcome measuresMean difference in total NHS costs between trial arms and blinded assessment of mean cost per 1 mm Hg systolic BP point reduced.
resultsHome telemonitoring of BP costs significantly more than usual care (mean difference per patient £115.32 (95% CI £83.49 to £146.63; p<0.001)). Increased costs were due to telemonitoring service costs, patient training and additional general practitioner and nurse consultations. The mean cost of systolic BP reduction was £25.56/mm Hg (95% CI £16.06 to £46.89) per patient.
conclusionsOver the 6-month trial period, supported telemonitoring was more effective at reducing BP than usual care but also more expensive. If clinical gains are maintained, these additional costs would be very likely to be compensated for by reductions in the cost of future cardiovascular events. Longer-term modelling of costs and outcomes is required to fully examine the cost-effectiveness implications.
trial registrationInternational Standard Randomised Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN72614272.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.