Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23849948›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Neurology2013

Effect of white-matter lesions on the risk of periprocedural stroke after carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS): a prespecified analysis of data from a randomised trial.

Jörg Ederle, Indran Davagnanam, H Bart van der Worp, Graham S Venables, Philippe A Lyrer, Roland L Featherstone, Martin M Brown, H Rolf Jäger, ICSS investigators

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Carotid Anatomy Does Not Predict the Risk of New Ischaemic Brain Lesions on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging after Carotid Artery Stenting in the ICSS-MRI Substudy.European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2016
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Carotid revascularization and cognitive impairment: the neglected role of cerebral small vessel disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Carotid Revascularization: Current Practice and Future Directions.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2020
    Review
  13. Frontiers in neurology · 2020
    Article
  14. Bullseye's representation of cerebral white matter hyperintensities.Journal of neuroradiology = Journal de neuroradiologie · 2018
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Interventions for Extracranial Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Update.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2016
    Review
  18. Perioperative stroke: risk assessment, prevention and treatment.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jörg EderleStroke Research Group, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK.
Indran DavagnanamLysholm Department of Neuroradiology, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK.
H Bart van der WorpUtrecht Stroke Center, Departments of Neurology, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Graham S VenablesNeurology Department, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Philippe A LyrerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Roland L FeatherstoneStroke Research Group, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK.
Martin M BrownStroke Research Group, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK. Electronic address: martin.brown@ucl.ac.uk.
H Rolf JägerStroke Research Group, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK; Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK.
ICSS investigators
University College London · GBNIHR Queen Square Dementia Biomedical Research Unit · GBRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

Department of Health 06/301/233Department of Health PB-PG-0609-19216Medical Research Council G0300411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFindings from randomised trials have shown a higher early risk of stroke after carotid artery stenting than after carotid endarterectomy. We assessed whether white-matter lesions affect the perioperative risk of stroke in patients treated with carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.

methodsPatients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis included in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) were randomly allocated to receive carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy. Copies of baseline brain imaging were analysed by two investigators, who were masked to treatment, for the severity of white-matter lesions using the age-related white-matter changes (ARWMC) score. Randomisation was done with a computer-generated sequence (1:1). Patients were divided into two groups using the median ARWMC. We analysed the risk of stroke within 30 days of revascularisation using a per-protocol analysis. ICSS is registered with controlled-trials.com, number ISRCTN 25337470.

findings1036 patients (536 randomly allocated to carotid artery stenting, 500 to carotid endarterectomy) had baseline imaging available. Median ARWMC score was 7, and patients were dichotomised into those with a score of 7 or more and those with a score of less than 7. In patients treated with carotid artery stenting, those with an ARWMC score of 7 or more had an increased risk of stroke compared with those with a score of less than 7 (HR for any stroke 2·76, 95% CI 1·17-6·51; p=0·021; HR for non-disabling stroke 3·00, 1·10-8·36; p=0·031), but we did not see a similar association in patients treated with carotid endarterectomy (HR for any stroke 1·18, 0·40-3·55; p=0·76; HR for disabling or fatal stroke 1·41, 0·38-5·26; p=0·607). Carotid artery stenting was associated with a higher risk of stroke compared with carotid endarterectomy in patients with an ARWMC score of 7 or more (HR for any stroke 2·98, 1·29-6·93; p=0·011; HR for non-disabling stroke 6·34, 1·45-27·71; p=0·014), but there was no risk difference in patients with an ARWMC score of less than 7.

interpretationThe presence of white-matter lesions on brain imaging should be taken into account when selecting patients for carotid revascularisation. Carotid artery stenting should be avoided in patients with more extensive white-matter lesions, but might be an acceptable alternative to carotid endarterectomy in patients with less extensive lesions.

fundingMedical Research Council, the Stroke Association, Sanofi-Synthélabo, the European Union Research Framework Programme 5.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCarotid StenosisCerebral RevascularizationEndarterectomy, CarotidFemaleHumansLeukoencephalopathiesMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRiskSingle-Blind MethodStentsStrokeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23849948
PMCPMC3744748
OpenAlexW2118383837

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.