Observational studyJournal of human hypertension2014
Diagnosis of true uncontrolled hypertension using both home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
Observational study in Journal of human hypertension, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Algorithm for diagnosing hypertension using out-of-office blood pressure measurements.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2021Article
- Number of Measurements Needed to Obtain a Reliable Estimate of Home Blood Pressure: Results From the Improving the Detection of Hypertension Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018Article
- The complexity of masked hypertension: diagnostic and management challenges.Current hypertension reports · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The definitive diagnosis of hypertension based on home blood pressure (BP) monitoring (HBPM) results may be practical, particularly in the primary care setting; however, some hypertensive patients are overlooked by HBPM alone. It is unclear which HBP cutoff value should set for patients who require ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). In the present study, home systolic BP (SBP) data (6 BP measurements taken for 3 days in the morning and evening) and 24-h ambulatory SBP data from 462 hypertensive subjects were obtained from a real-world clinical study. Using HBPM as an initial step for the definitive diagnosis of hypertension, 381 of 462 total subjects had a home SBP value of 135 mm Hg. Of these 381 subjects, 90.3% had ambulatory SBP values of 130 mm Hg. Among the other 81 subjects with home SBP values of <135 mm Hg, 60.5% had ambulatory SBP values of 130 mm Hg ('true uncontrolled hypertension'). These percentages differed significantly (P<0.0001). The cutoff home SBP value of 135 mm Hg could discriminate between subjects who did not require ABPM (home SBP value of 135 mm Hg) and those who did (home SBP value of <135 mm Hg) for the diagnosis of true uncontrolled hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23924872What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.