SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013
Nursing interventions for smoking cessation.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions for smoking cessation in people diagnosed with lung cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Nursing interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Individual behavioural counselling for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Psychosocial interventions for smoking cessation in patients with coronary heart disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Interventions for preoperative smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Trial
- The Effectiveness of a Computer-Tailored E-Learning Program for Practice Nurses to Improve Their Adherence to Smoking Cessation Counseling Guidelines: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Trial
- A Brief Smoking Cessation Advice by Youth Counselors for the Smokers in the Hong Kong Quit to Win Contest 2010: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Implementation of the Tobacco Tactics intervention versus usual care in Trinity Health community hospitals.Implementation science : IS · 2016Trial
- Referring Hospitalized Smokers to Outpatient Quit Services: A Randomized Trial.American journal of preventive medicine · 2016Trial
- Effectiveness of the Tobacco Tactics Program in the Trinity Health System.American journal of preventive medicine · 2016Trial
- Brief advice and active referral for smoking cessation services among community smokers: a study protocol for randomized controlled trial.BMC public health · 2016Trial
- Are Nurses and Auxiliary Healthcare Workers Equally Effective in Delivering Smoking Cessation Support in Primary Care?Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Changes in risk habits and influencing factors in the Taiwan oral cancer screening program.PloS one · 2025Article
- The role of nurses in smoking cessation interventions for patients: a scoping review.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Enabling tobacco treatment for gastroenterology patients via a novel low-burden point-of-care model.BMC health services research · 2024Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare professionals, including nurses, frequently advise people to improve their health by stopping smoking. Such advice may be brief, or part of more intensive interventions.
objectivesTo determine the effectiveness of nursing-delivered smoking cessation interventions. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group specialized Register and CINAHL in June 2013. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials of smoking cessation interventions delivered by nurses or health visitors with follow-up of at least six months. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors extracted data independently. The main outcome measure was abstinence from smoking after at least six months of follow-up. We used the most rigorous definition of abstinence for each trial, and biochemically validated rates if available. Where statistically and clinically appropriate, we pooled studies using a Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model and reported the outcome as a risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). MAIN
resultsForty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Pooling 35 studies (over 17,000 participants) comparing a nursing intervention to a control or to usual care, we found the intervention to increase the likelihood of quitting (RR 1.29; 95% CI 1.20 to 1.39). In a subgroup analysis the estimated effect size was similar for the group of seven studies using a particularly low intensity intervention but the confidence interval was wider. There was limited indirect evidence that interventions were more effective for hospital inpatients with cardiovascular disease than for inpatients with other conditions. Interventions in non-hospitalized adults also showed evidence of benefit. Eleven studies comparing different nurse-delivered interventions failed to detect significant benefit from using additional components. Six studies of nurse counselling on smoking cessation during a screening health check or as part of multifactorial secondary prevention in general practice (not included in the main meta-analysis) found nursing intervention to have less effect under these conditions. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThe results indicate the potential benefits of smoking cessation advice and/or counselling given by nurses, with reasonable evidence that intervention is effective. The evidence for an effect is weaker when interventions are brief and are provided by nurses whose main role is not health promotion or smoking cessation. The challenge will be to incorporate smoking behaviour monitoring and smoking cessation interventions as part of standard practice so that all patients are given an opportunity to be asked about their tobacco use and to be given advice and/or counselling to quit along with reinforcement and follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.