Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2013
Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1,308 papers, 22 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A 16-wk, Uni-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel, Phase 3b Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of Saxagliptin + Dapagliflozin vs.Dapagliflozin With Regard to EGP in T2DM With Insufficient Glycemic Control on Metformin+/-Sulfonylurea Therapy
Pleiotropic Effects of Dapagliflozin in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes
A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase IV Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Saxagliptin on the Incidence of Cardiovascular Death, Myocardial Infarction or Ischaemic Stroke in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
DPP-4 Inhibitors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Myocardial Infarction:Effects on Platelet Function
Who cites it
1,308 citing papers in PubMed, 22 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.Diabetes care · 2026Guideline
- Genomic and transcriptomic analyses of aortic stenosis enhance therapeutic target discovery and disease prediction.Nature genetics · 2026Pooled it
- Cardiovascular benefits of semaglutide: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025 · on this mapPooled it
- Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Kidney Outcomes With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Versus Other Glucose-Lowering Agents in People With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Data.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Age and Sex Differences in Efficacy of Treatments for Type 2 Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis.JAMA · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative cardiovascular effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease phenotypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2025Pooled it
- Assessing the benefit-risk profile of newer glucose-lowering drugs: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized outcome trials.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Pooled it
- Novel antidiabetic agents and the risk of respiratory diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 27 randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors on the risk of acute respiratory failure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcomes trials.Endocrine journal · 2024Pooled it
- [Cardiovascular preventive recommendations. PAPPS 2024 thematic updates].Atencion primaria · 2024Guideline
- Cardiovascular Effectiveness and Safety of Antidiabetic Drugs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Peripheral Artery Disease: Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Pooled it
- Agreement Between Mega-Trials and Smaller Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Research Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Racial, ethnic and regional differences in the effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular and renal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Acute kidney injury events in patients with diabetes using sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.Acta diabetologica · 2024Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of sotagliflozin in patients with type II diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of nephrology · 2024Pooled it
- Twenty years of participation of racialised groups in type 2 diabetes randomised clinical trials: a meta-epidemiological review.Diabetologia · 2024Pooled it
- Latin-American guidelines of recommendations at discharge from an acute coronary syndrome.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2024Guideline
- Effects of new hypoglycemic drugs on cardiac remodeling: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Pooled it
1,248 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe cardiovascular safety and efficacy of many current antihyperglycemic agents, including saxagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, are unclear.
methodsWe randomly assigned 16,492 patients with type 2 diabetes who had a history of, or were at risk for, cardiovascular events to receive saxagliptin or placebo and followed them for a median of 2.1 years. Physicians were permitted to adjust other medications, including antihyperglycemic agents. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke.
resultsA primary end-point event occurred in 613 patients in the saxagliptin group and in 609 patients in the placebo group (7.3% and 7.2%, respectively, according to 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimates; hazard ratio with saxagliptin, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.12; P=0.99 for superiority; P<0.001 for noninferiority); the results were similar in the "on-treatment" analysis (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.17). The major secondary end point of a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, coronary revascularization, or heart failure occurred in 1059 patients in the saxagliptin group and in 1034 patients in the placebo group (12.8% and 12.4%, respectively, according to 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimates; hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.11; P=0.66). More patients in the saxagliptin group than in the placebo group were hospitalized for heart failure (3.5% vs. 2.8%; hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.51; P=0.007). Rates of adjudicated cases of acute and chronic pancreatitis were similar in the two groups (acute pancreatitis, 0.3% in the saxagliptin group and 0.2% in the placebo group; chronic pancreatitis, <0.1% and 0.1% in the two groups, respectively).
conclusionsDPP-4 inhibition with saxagliptin did not increase or decrease the rate of ischemic events, though the rate of hospitalization for heart failure was increased. Although saxagliptin improves glycemic control, other approaches are necessary to reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes. (Funded by AstraZeneca and Bristol-Myers Squibb; SAVOR-TIMI 53 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01107886.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
23992601What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.