Trial reportTrials2013
Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01352247 (Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient relevant outcomes of unicompartmental versus total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2019Pooled it
- A systematic review of the use of an expertise-based randomised controlled trial design.Trials · 2015Pooled it
- Expertise-based design in surgical trials: a narrative review.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgiePooled it
- Total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the TOPKAT RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2020Trial
- The clinical and cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial.Lancet (London, England) · 2019Trial
- Advancing multi-database cohort studies: lessons learned from a studyathon in a pharmaceutical company.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- An evaluation of a low-cost platelet-rich plasma for osteoarthritis of the knee: A pilot study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- A retrospective comparison of Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- The effect of high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty on patellofemoral joint in young patients with medial knee arthrosis.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Article
- Group sequential designs in pragmatic trials: feasibility and assessment of utility using data from a number of recent surgical RCTs.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
- Article
- Comparison of Pain, Muscle Strength, and Functional Status Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty, Total Knee Arthroplasty, and Conservative Management of Gonarthrosis.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee: a review of surgical options.EFORT open reviews · 2021Review
- Further reflections on TOPKAT and PartialAnnals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Partial or total knee replacement? Identifying patients' information needs on knee replacement surgery: a qualitative study to inform a decision aid.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial.Trials · 2019Article
- Randomized clinical trial of medial unicompartmentel versus total knee arthroplasty for anteromedial tibio-femoral osteoarthritis. The study-protocol.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2019Article
- Outcomes and early revision rate after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: prospective results from a non-designer single surgeon.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2018Article
- Choosing Between Unicompartmental and Total Knee Replacement: What Can Economic Evaluations Tell Us? A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the majority of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee the disease originates in the medial compartment. There are two fundamentally different approaches to knee replacement for patients with unicompartmental disease: some surgeons feel that it is always best to replace both the knee compartments with a total knee replacement (TKR); whereas others feel it is best to replace just the damaged component of the knee using a partial or unicompartment replacement (UKR). Both interventions are established and well-documented procedures. Little evidence exists to prove the clinical and cost-effectiveness of either management option. This provides an explanation for the high variation in treatment of choice by individual surgeons for the same knee pathology.The aim of the TOPKAT study will be to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of TKRs compared to UKRs in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis. METHODS/
designThe design of the study is a single layer multicentre superiority type randomised controlled trial of unilateral knee replacement patients. Blinding will not be possible as the surgical scars for each procedure differ.We aim to recruit 500 patients from approximately 28 secondary care orthopaedic units from across the UK including district general and teaching hospitals. Participants will be randomised to either UKR or TKR. Randomisation will occur using a web-based randomisation system. The study is pragmatic in terms of implant selection for the knee replacement operation. Participants will be followed up for 5 years. The primary outcome is the Oxford Knee Score, which will be collected via questionnaires at 2 months, 1 year and then annually to 5 years. Secondary outcomes will include cost-effectiveness, patient satisfaction and complications data.
trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN03013488; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01352247.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.