Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24028414›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

David Beard, Andrew Price, Jonathan Cook, Ray Fitzpatrick, Andrew Carr, Marion Campbell, Helen Doll, Helen Campbell, Nigel Arden, Cushla Cooper and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01352247 (Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01352247 nacompletednot on this map

Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2010 to 2024Enrolled500ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsUnicompartmental Knee Replacement, Total Knee Replacement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Expertise-based design in surgical trials: a narrative review.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Further reflections on TOPKAT and PartialAnnals of translational medicine · 2020
    Article
  16. Partial or total knee replacement? Identifying patients' information needs on knee replacement surgery: a qualitative study to inform a decision aid.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David BeardNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK. david.beard@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
Andrew Price
Jonathan Cook
Ray Fitzpatrick
Andrew Carr
Marion Campbell
Helen Doll
Helen Campbell
Nigel Arden
Cushla Cooper
Loretta Davies
David Murray
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Department of Health 08/14/08Medical Research Council G0400491Medical Research Council G1002292Medical Research Council MC_U147585819Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the majority of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee the disease originates in the medial compartment. There are two fundamentally different approaches to knee replacement for patients with unicompartmental disease: some surgeons feel that it is always best to replace both the knee compartments with a total knee replacement (TKR); whereas others feel it is best to replace just the damaged component of the knee using a partial or unicompartment replacement (UKR). Both interventions are established and well-documented procedures. Little evidence exists to prove the clinical and cost-effectiveness of either management option. This provides an explanation for the high variation in treatment of choice by individual surgeons for the same knee pathology.The aim of the TOPKAT study will be to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of TKRs compared to UKRs in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis. METHODS/

designThe design of the study is a single layer multicentre superiority type randomised controlled trial of unilateral knee replacement patients. Blinding will not be possible as the surgical scars for each procedure differ.We aim to recruit 500 patients from approximately 28 secondary care orthopaedic units from across the UK including district general and teaching hospitals. Participants will be randomised to either UKR or TKR. Randomisation will occur using a web-based randomisation system. The study is pragmatic in terms of implant selection for the knee replacement operation. Participants will be followed up for 5 years. The primary outcome is the Oxford Knee Score, which will be collected via questionnaires at 2 months, 1 year and then annually to 5 years. Secondary outcomes will include cost-effectiveness, patient satisfaction and complications data.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN03013488; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01352247.

Indexed as

Research DesignArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth Care CostsHumansKnee JointOsteoarthritis, KneePatient SatisfactionPatient SelectionSample SizeSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID24028414
PMCPMC3848560
OpenAlexW2110782444

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.