Evidence mapPaperPMID 24037801Full record

Trial reportCancer2013

Preservation of neurocognitive function and local control of 1 to 3 brain metastases treated with surgery and carmustine wafers.

Steven Brem, Christina A Meyers, Gary Palmer, Margaret Booth-Jones, Surbhi Jain, Matthew G Ewend

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03975959 (Prospective and Retrospective Memory Perception Assessment in Central/Non-central Nervous System Cancers), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03975959 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Prospective and Retrospective Memory Perception Assessment in Central/Non-central Nervous System Cancers

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleRan2019 to 2024Enrolled426ConditionsGlioblastoma, Glioma, Breast Cancer, HealthyArmsQMRP questionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Steven BremDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida; Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania and the Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Christina A Meyers
Gary Palmer
Margaret Booth-Jones
Surbhi Jain
Matthew G Ewend
Moffitt Cancer Center · USEisai (United States) · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

Tissue CoreP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · 1998 to 2025
$32.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurosurgical resection and whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) are accepted treatments for single and oligometastatic cancer to the brain. To avoid the decline in neurocognitive function (NCF) linked to WBRT, the authors conducted a prospective, multicenter, phase 2 study to determine whether surgery and carmustine wafers (CW), while deferring WBRT, could preserve NCF and achieve local control (LC).

methodsNCF and LC were measured in 59 patients who underwent resection and received CW for a single (83%) or dominant (oligometastatic, 2 to 3 lesions) metastasis and received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for tiny nodules not treated with resection plus CW. Preservation of NCF was defined as an improvement or a decline ≤ 1 standard deviation from baseline in 3 domains: memory, executive function, and fine motor skills, evaluated at 2-month intervals.

resultsSignificant improvements in executive function and memory occurred throughout the 1-year follow-up. Preservation or improvement of NCF occurred in all 3 domains for the majority of patients at each of the 2-month intervals. NCF declined in only 1 patient. The chemowafers were well tolerated, and serious adverse events were reversible. There was local recurrence in 28% of the patients at 1-year follow-up.

conclusionsPatients with brain metastases had improvements in their cognitive trajectory, especially memory and executive function, after treatment with resection plus CW. The rate of LC (78%) was comparable to historic rates of surgery with WBRT and superior to reports of WBRT alone. For patients who undergo resection for symptomatic or large-volume metastasis or for tissue diagnosis, the addition of CW can be considered as an option.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBrain NeoplasmsCarmustineCognitionCognition DisordersCombined Modality TherapyDrug ImplantsFemaleHumansInfusions, IntralesionalMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingCarmustineDrug Implantsbrain metastasescarmustine wafersneurocognitive functionstereotactic radiosurgerywhole brain radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID24037801
PMCPMC4209121
OpenAlexW1554181041

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.