Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24101021›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of surgery2013

State of the art of robotic surgery in organ transplantation.

Ivo Tzvetanov, Lorena Bejarano-Pineda, Pier C Giulianotti, Hoonbae Jeon, Raquel Garcia-Roca, Francesco Bianco, José Oberholzer, Enrico Benedetti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet?World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Past, present and future of urological robotic surgery.Investigative and clinical urology · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Robotic assisted kidney transplantation.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ivo TzvetanovDivision of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, 840 South Wood Street, CSB 402, MC 958, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA, itzveta@uic.edu.
Lorena Bejarano-Pineda
Pier C Giulianotti
Hoonbae Jeon
Raquel Garcia-Roca
Francesco Bianco
José Oberholzer
Enrico Benedetti
University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the last two decades the application of minimally invasive surgical technologies has shown significant benefits when it comes to complex surgical procedures. Lower rates of complications and higher patient satisfaction are commonly reported. Until recently these benefits were inaccessible for patients with solid organ transplantation, because conventional laparoscopy was seen as nonapplicable in such technically demanding procedures. The introduction of the da Vinci Robotic Surgical System, with its inherent advantages, has expanded the ability to complete solid organ transplantation in a minimally invasive fashion. Robotic applications in kidney, pancreas, and liver transplantation have been reported. The initial results showed the viability of this technique in the field. The most extensive experience has been described in kidney transplantation. Over 700 donor nephrectomies and more than 70 renal transplants have been performed successfully with the robotic system. The proven advantage of the robotic technique, especially in obese kidney recipients, is a significantly lower rate of surgical site infection, which in these highly immunosuppressed patients is reflected in superior outcomes. The first results in pancreas transplantation and living donor hepatectomy are very promising; however, larger series are needed in order to address the value of the robotic surgery in these areas of solid organ transplantation.

Indexed as

HumansKidney TransplantationLaparoscopyLiver TransplantationLiving DonorsNephrectomyPancreas TransplantationRobotics

Identifiers

PMID24101021
OpenAlexW2086984314

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.