Evidence mapPaperPMID 24112417Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2013

Rationale, design, and methodology for the optimizing outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus and their infants study.

Diane C Berry, Madeline Neal, Emily G Hall, Todd A Schwartz, Sarah Verbiest, Karen Bonuck, William Goodnight, Seth Brody, Karen F Dorman, Mary K Menard and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01809431 (Optimizing Outcomes in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Their Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01809431 nacompletednot on this map

Optimizing Outcomes in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Their Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2012 to 2014Enrolled200ConditionsGestational DiabetesArmsIntervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. A Cluster Randomized Trial of Tailored Breastfeeding Support for Women with Gestational Diabetes.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2016
    Trial
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Gestational Diabetes Group Program.The Journal of perinatal education · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Diane C BerrySchool of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 7460, Chapel Hill 27599-7460, NC, USA. dberry@email.unc.edu.
Madeline Neal
Emily G Hall
Todd A Schwartz
Sarah Verbiest
Karen Bonuck
William Goodnight
Seth Brody
Karen F Dorman
Mary K Menard
Alison M Stuebe

Funding

NIDDK NIH HHS 1R21DK092750-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen who are diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at increased risk for developing prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). To date, there have been few interdisciplinary interventions that target predominantly ethnic minority low-income women diagnosed with GDM. This paper describes the rationale, design and methodology of a 2-year, randomized, controlled study being conducted in North Carolina. METHODS/

designUsing a two-group, repeated measures, experimental design, we will test a 14- week intensive intervention on the benefits of breastfeeding, understanding gestational diabetes and risk of progression to prediabetes and T2DM, nutrition and exercise education, coping skills training, physical activity (Phase I), educational and motivational text messaging and 3 months of continued monthly contact (Phase II). A total of 100 African American, non-Hispanic white, and bilingual Hispanic women between 22-36 weeks of pregnancy who are diagnosed with GDM and their infants will be randomized to either the experimental group or the wait-listed control group. The first aim of the study is to determine the feasibility of the intervention. The second aim of study is to test the effects of the intervention on maternal outcomes from baseline (22-36 weeks pregnant) to 10 months postpartum. Primary maternal outcomes will include fasting blood glucose and weight (BMI) from baseline to 10 months postpartum. Secondary maternal outcomes will include clinical, adiposity, health behaviors and self-efficacy outcomes from baseline to 10 months postpartum. The third aim of the study is to quantify the effects of the intervention on infant feeding and growth. Infant outcomes will include weight status and breastfeeding from birth through 10 months of age. Data analysis will include general linear mixed-effects models. Safety endpoints include adverse event reporting. DISCUSSION: Findings from this trial may lead to an effective intervention to assist women diagnosed with GDM to improve maternal glucose homeostasis and weight as well as stabilize infant growth trajectory, reducing the burden of metabolic disease across two generations.

trial registrationNCT01809431.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalHealth BehaviorPatient Education as TopicPostnatal CareResearch DesignAdiposityBlood GlucoseBlood PressureBreast FeedingChild DevelopmentCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DietFemaleGlycated HemoglobinBlood GlucoseCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLGlycated HemoglobinTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID24112417
PMCPMC3907028

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.