Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24150837›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2013

Evaluation of the incidence and risk of hypoglycemic coma associated with selection of basal insulin in the treatment of diabetes: a Finnish register linkage study.

Jari Haukka, Fabian Hoti, Panu Erästö, Tero Saukkonen, Sari Mäkimattila, Pasi Korhonen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Understanding the Clinical Profile of Insulin Degludec, the Latest Basal Insulin Approved for Use in Canada: a Narrative Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020
    Review
  7. Observational
  8. Adherence to Basal Insulin Therapy Among People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Costs and Patient Outcomes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2018
    Article
  9. Effectiveness and safety of insulin glargineTherapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2018
    Article
  10. Analysis of Risk Factors for Hypoglycemic Coma in 194 Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017
    Article
  11. Challenges and unmet needs in basal insulin therapy: lessons from the Asian experience.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2017
    Review
  12. Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Analog Glargine in Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jari HaukkaEPID Research Ltd, Espoo, Finland.
Fabian Hoti
Panu Erästö
Tero Saukkonen
Sari Mäkimattila
Pasi Korhonen
Novo Nordisk (Denmark) · DKNovo Nordisk (Finland) · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLong-acting basal insulin analogs have demonstrated positive effects on the balance between effective glycemic control and risk of hypoglycemia versus neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in randomized controlled trials. Evidence of severe hypoglycemic risk with insulin detemir, insulin glargine, or NPH insulin is presented from a nationwide retrospective database study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsData from hospital and secondary healthcare visits due to hypoglycemic coma from 75 682 insulin-naïve type 1 or 2 diabetes patients initiating therapy with NPH insulin, insulin glargine, or insulin detemir in Finland between 2000 and 2009 were analyzed. Incidence rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Poisson regression. Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox's regression with adjustments for relevant background variables.

resultsThe adjusted risk of hospital/secondary healthcare visits due to the first severe hypoglycemic event was 21.7% (95% CI 9.6-32.1%, p < 0.001) lower for insulin detemir and 9.9% (95% CI 1.5-17.6%, p = 0.022) lower for insulin glargine versus NPH insulin. Risk of hypoglycemic coma recurrence was 36.3% (95% CI 8.9-55.5%, p = 0.014) lower for detemir and 9.5% but not significantly (95% CI -10.2 to 25.7%, p = 0.318) lower for glargine versus NPH insulin. Risk of all hypoglycemic coma events was 30.8% (95% CI 16.2-42.8%, p-value <0.001) lower for detemir and 15.6% (95% CI 5.1-25.0%, p-value 0.005) lower for glargine versus NPH. Insulin detemir had a significantly lower risk for first (13.1% lower [p = 0.034]), recurrent (29.6% lower [p = 0.021]), and all (17.9% lower [p = 0.016]) severe hypoglycemic events than insulin glargine.

conclusionsThere were considerable differences in risk of hospitalization or secondary healthcare visits due to hypoglycemic coma between basal insulin treatments in real-life clinical practice.

Indexed as

Diabetic ComaHypoglycemiaDatabases, FactualDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleFinlandFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansHypoglycemic AgentsIncidenceInsulin DetemirInsulin GlargineInsulin, IsophaneInsulin, Long-ActingHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin DetemirInsulin GlargineInsulin, IsophaneInsulin, Long-Actingbasal insulinhypoglycemiapharmacoepidemiologyregister linkage study

Identifiers

PMID24150837
PMCPMC4265848
OpenAlexW1960751741

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.