Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24211112›Full record

Trial reportNursing outlook

A pilot test of an integrated self-care intervention for persons with heart failure and concomitant diabetes.

Sandra B Dunbar, Brittany Butts, Carolyn M Reilly, Rebecca A Gary, Melinda K Higgins, Erin P Ferranti, Steven D Culler, Javed Butler

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nursing outlook. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sandra B DunbarNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: sbdunba@emory.edu.
Brittany ButtsNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Carolyn M ReillyNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Rebecca A GaryNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Melinda K HigginsNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Erin P FerrantiNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Steven D CullerRollins School of Public Health and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Javed ButlerSchool of Medicine and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
Training in Interventions to Improve Outcomes in Chronic ConditionsT32NR012715 · NINR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GARY, REBECCA A, SONG, MI-KYUNG · 2012 to 2022
$3.2M
Improving Self Management and Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients with DiabetesR21NR011204 · NINR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DUNBAR, SANDRA B. · 2009 to 2010
$426k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000454NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000454NINR NIH HHS R21 NR011204NINR NIH HHS T32 NR012715NINR NIH HHS T32NR012715PHS HHS R21NRO11204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies show 30% to 47% of people with heart failure (HF) have concomitant diabetes mellitus (DM). Self-care for persons with both of these chronic conditions is conflicting, complex, and often inadequate. This pilot study tested an integrated self-care program for its effects on HF and DM knowledge, self-care efficacy, self-care behaviors, and quality of life (QOL). Hospitalized HF-DM participants (N = 71) were randomized to usual care or intervention using a 1:2 allocation and followed at 30 and 90 days after intervention. Intervention was an integrated education and counseling program focused on HF-DM self-care. Variables included demographic and clinical data, knowledge about HF and DM, HF- and DM-specific self-efficacy, standard HF and DM QOL scales, and HF and DM self-care behaviors. Analysis included descriptive statistics, multilevel longitudinal models for group and time effects, post hoc testing, and effect size calculations. Sidak adjustments were used to control for type 1 error inflation. The integrated HF-DM self-care intervention conferred effects on improved HF knowledge (30 days, p = .05), HF self-care maintenance (30 and 90 days, p < .001), HF self-care management (90 days, p = .05), DM self-efficacy (30 days, p = .03; 90 days, p = .004), general diet (30 days, p = .05), HF physical QOL (p = .04), and emotional QOL scores (p = .05) at 90 days within the intervention group. The participants in the usual care group also reported increased total and physical QOL. Greater percentages of participants in the intervention group improved self reported exercise between 0 and 30 days (p = .005 and moderate effect size ES = .47) and foot care between 0 and 90 days (p = .03, small ES = .36). No group differences or improvements in DM-specific QOL were observed. An integrated HF-DM self-care intervention was effective in improving essential components of self-care and had sustained (90 day) effects on selected self-care behaviors. Future studies testing HF-DM integrated self-care interventions in larger samples with longer follow-up and on other outcomes such as hospitalization and clinical markers are warranted.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicQuality of LifeAdultAgedChronic DiseaseComorbidityDiabetes MellitusDisease ManagementFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHeart FailureHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMultilevel AnalysisDiabetesHeart failureInterventionSelf-care

Identifiers

PMID24211112
PMCPMC3959269

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.