Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24233387›Full record

SynthesisJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2014

Primary venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with solid tumors: a meta-analysis.

Minh Phan, Sonia John, Ana I Casanegra, Suman Rathbun, Aaron Mansfield, Julie A Stoner, Alfonso J Tafur

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Parenteral anticoagulation in ambulatory patients with cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Performance of Current Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Tools in Patients With Gastric Cancer and Validity After First Treatment.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Predictors of Early Mortality in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Analysis of the RIETE Database.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2018
    Article
  12. Predictors of active cancer thromboembolic outcomes: role of body composition.International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Primary thromboprophylaxis in patients with solid cancers.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Minh PhanInternal Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Sonia John
Ana I Casanegra
Suman Rathbun
Aaron Mansfield
Julie A Stoner
Alfonso J Tafur
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of Oklahoma · US

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM104938 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI Janis E Campbell · 2013 to 2026
$68.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of death among outpatient chemotherapy patients. However the VTE preventive measures for outpatients are not widely advocated. We did a meta-analysis to evaluate the outpatient VTE prevention's effectiveness and safety. We searched electronic databases until the end of December 2012 and reviewed the abstracts and manuscripts following the PRISMA guidelines. Occurrence of first VTE event was the efficacy outcome. The safety end point was major bleeding. We calculated Q statistic and a homogeneity formal test. The odds ratio (OR) estimates were pooled by using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects method in the absence of heterogeneity. Data were analyzed using the R META package). We identified 1,485 articles and reviewed 37 articles based on initial screening. The number of patients included in 11 selected trials was 7,805. The odds of VTE was lower in the prophylaxis group (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.45-0.71) and improved when heparin-based prevention was analyzed (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.41-0.70). We found strong prevention among patients with lung cancer (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.29-0.74) and pancreatic cancer (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.16-0.67). Major bleeding events were frequent in the intervention group (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.12-2.44). Thromboprophylaxis reduced VTE episodes. The VTE events were reduced by 47% in heparin-based prophylaxis trials compared to placebo. The patients receiving heparin-based prophylaxis had a 60% increase in bleeding events. Improving risk stratification tools to personalize prevention strategies may enhance the VTE prevention applicability in cancer patients.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsVenous Thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID24233387
PMCPMC4427894
OpenAlexW2085889132

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.