Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24465624›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

Levofloxacin-based first-line therapy versus standard first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Musthafa Chalikandy Peedikayil, Fahad Ibrahim Alsohaibani, Abdullah Hamad Alkhenizan

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ACG Clinical Guideline: Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2017
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Management ofJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Optimization Strategies Aimed to Increase the Efficacy ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Antibiotic treatment for Helicobacter pylori: Is the end coming?World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2015
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Practice guidelines for the management ofSaudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Musthafa Chalikandy PeedikayilDepartment of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Fahad Ibrahim AlsohaibaniDepartment of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Hamad AlkhenizanDepartment of Family Medicine & Polyclinics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFirst-line levofloxacin-based treatments eradicate Helicobacter pylori with varying success. We examined the efficacy and safety of first-line levofloxacin-based treatment in comparison to standard first-line therapy for H pylori eradication. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe searched literature databases from Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Register of Randomized Controlled Trials through March 2013 for randomized controlled trials comparing first-line levofloxacin and standard therapy. We included randomized controlled trials conducted only on naïve H pylori infected patients in adults. A systematic review was conducted. Meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.2. Treatment effect was determined by relative risk with a random or fixed model by the Mantel-Haenszel method.

resultsSeven trials were identified with 888 patients receiving 7 days of first-line levofloxacin and 894 treated with standard therapy (Amoxicillin, Clarithromycin and proton pump inhibitor) for 7 days. The overall crude eradication rate in the Levofloxacin group was 79.05% versus 81.4% in the standard group (risk ratio 0.97; 95% CI; 0.93, 1.02). The overall dropout was 46 (5.2%) in the levofloxacin group and 52 (5.8%) for standard therapy. The dizziness was more common among group who took Levofloxacin based treatment and taste disturbance was more common among group who took standard therapy. Meta-analysis of overall adverse events were similar between the two groups with a relative risk of 1.06 (95% CI 0.72, 1.57).

conclusionHelicobacter pylori eradication with 7 days of Levofloxacin-based first line therapy was safe and equal compared to 7 days of standard first-line therapy.

Indexed as

AdultAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsClarithromycinDrug Therapy, CombinationHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansLevofloxacinProton Pump InhibitorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsClarithromycinLevofloxacinProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID24465624
PMCPMC3897467
OpenAlexW2052952508

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.