ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2014
Assessment of the cardiovascular safety of saxagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: pooled analysis of 20 clinical trials.
Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cardiovascular Safety of Incretin-Based Therapies in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review of Integrated Analyses and Randomized Controlled Trials.Advances in therapy · 2017Pooled it
- Evaluation of the therapeutic effect of new hypoglycemic drugs on patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Energy metabolism in cardiovascular diseases: unlocking the hidden powerhouse of cardiac pathophysiology.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Redefining diabetes mellitus treatments according to different mechanisms beyond hypoglycaemic effect.Heart failure reviews · 2023Review
- DPP-4 inhibitors for treating T2DM - hype or hope? an analysis based on the current literature.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Review
- Saxagliptin Cardiotoxicity in Chronic Heart Failure: The Role of DPP4 in the Regulation of Neuropeptide Tone.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors as new tools for cardioprotection.Heart failure reviews · 2021Review
- Cardiovascular Effects of New Oral Glucose-Lowering Agents: DPP-4 and SGLT-2 Inhibitors.Circulation research · 2018Review
- Nonclinical and clinical pharmacology evidence for cardiovascular safety of saxagliptin.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2017Review
- Article
- Cardiovascular safety assessment of pramlintide in type 2 diabetes: results from a pooled analysis of five clinical trials.Clinical diabetes and endocrinology · 2016Article
- Insights from cardiovascular outcome trials with novel antidiabetes agents: what have we learned? An industry perspective.Current diabetes reports · 2015Review
- Saxagliptin: A Review in Type 2 Diabetes.Drugs · 2015Review
- Antidiabetic treatment with gliptins: focus on cardiovascular effects and outcomes.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2015Review
- Increased Risk of Hospitalization for Heart Failure with Newly Prescribed Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and Pioglitazone Using the Korean Health Insurance Claims Database.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2015Article
- A real world comparison of sulfonylurea and insulin vs. incretin-based treatments in patients not controlled on prior metformin monotherapy.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2015 · on this mapObservational
- Overview of saxagliptin efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease or risk factors for cardiovascular disease.Vascular health and risk management · 2015Review
- Recent Advances in Dipeptidyl-Peptidase-4 Inhibition Therapy: Lessons from the Bench and Clinical Trials.Journal of diabetes research · 2015Review
- Balancing benefits and risks in patients receiving incretin-based therapies: focus on cardiovascular and pancreatic side effects.Drug safety · 2014Article
- A Review on Cardiovascular Outcome Studies of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is important to establish the cardiovascular (CV) safety profile of novel antidiabetic drugs.
methodsPooled analyses were performed of 20 randomized controlled studies (N = 9156) of saxagliptin as monotherapy or add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as well as a subset of 11 saxagliptin + metformin studies. Adjudicated major adverse CV events (MACE; CV death, myocardial infarction [MI], and stroke) and investigator-reported heart failure were assessed, and incidence rates (IRs; events/100 patient-years) and IR ratios (IRRs; saxagliptin/control) were calculated (Mantel-Haenszel method).
resultsIn pooled datasets, the IR point estimates for MACE and individual components of CV death, MI, and stroke favored saxagliptin, but the 95% CI included 1. IRR (95% CI) for MACE in the 20-study pool was 0.74 (0.45, 1.25). The Cox proportional hazard ratio (95% CI) was 0.75 (0.46, 1.21), suggesting no increased risk of MACE in the 20-study pool. In the 11-study saxagliptin + metformin pool, the IRR for MACE was 0.93 (0.44, 1.99). In the 20-study pool, the IRR for heart failure was 0.55 (0.27, 1.12).
conclusionsAnalysis of pooled data from 20 clinical trials in patients with T2DM suggests that saxagliptin is not associated with an increased CV risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.