Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24532022›Full record

ArticleJournal of cellular physiology2014

Link between DNA damage and centriole disengagement/reduplication in untransformed human cells.

Stephen Douthwright, Greenfield Sluder

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cellular physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mind the replication gap.Royal Society open science · 2021
    Review
  10. Xeroderma Pigmentosum: A Model for Human Premature Aging.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Building the right centriole for each cell type.The Journal of cell biology · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Centrosomes in the DNA damage response--the hub outside the centre.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen DouthwrightDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Greenfield Sluder
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

RNA IN FORMATION, FUNCTION, AND REPRODUCTION OF CENTROSOR01GM030758 · NIGMS · WORCESTER FOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI SLUDER, GREENFIELD · 1985 to 2014
$6.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM30758NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM030758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The radiation and radiomimetic drugs used to treat human tumors damage DNA in both cancer cells and normal proliferating cells. Centrosome amplification after DNA damage is well established for transformed cell types but is sparsely reported and not fully understood in untransformed cells. We characterize centriole behavior after DNA damage in synchronized untransformed human cells. One hour treatment of S phase cells with the radiomimetic drug, Doxorubicin, prolongs G2 by at least 72 h, though 14% of the cells eventually go through mitosis in that time. By 72 h after DNA damage we observe a 52% incidence of centriole disengagement plus a 10% incidence of extra centrioles. We find that either APC/C or Plk activities can disengage centrioles after DNA damage, though they normally work in concert. All disengaged centrioles are associated with γ-tubulin and maturation markers and thus, should in principle be capable of reduplicating and organizing spindle poles. The low incidence of reduplication of disengaged centrioles during G2 is due to the p53-dependent expression of p21 and the consequent loss of Cdk2 activity. We find that 26% of the cells going through mitosis after DNA damage contain disengaged or extra centrioles. This could produce genomic instability through transient or persistent spindle multipolarity. Thus, for cancer patients the use of DNA damaging therapies raises the chances of genomic instability and evolution of transformed characteristics in proliferating normal cell populations.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAnaphase-Promoting Complex-CyclosomeAntibiotics, AntineoplasticCell Cycle ProteinsCell LineCell ProliferationCell Transformation, NeoplasticCentriolesCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21DoxorubicinG2 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsGenomic InstabilityHumansPolo-Like Kinase 1Protein Kinase InhibitorsAnaphase-Promoting Complex-CyclosomeAntibiotics, AntineoplasticCDK2 protein, humanCDKN1A protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21DoxorubicinPolo-Like Kinase 1Protein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsTP53 protein, humanTubulinTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID24532022
PMCPMC4122266
OpenAlexW2134026238

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.