Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24533897›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2014

A complex intervention to improve pregnancy outcome in obese women; the UPBEAT randomised controlled trial.

Annette L Briley, Suzanne Barr, Shirlene Badger, Ruth Bell, Helen Croker, Keith M Godfrey, Bridget Holmes, Tarja I Kinnunen, Scott M Nelson, Eugene Oteng-Ntim and 8 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 53 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Annette L Briley
Suzanne Barr
Shirlene Badger
Ruth Bell
Helen Croker
Keith M Godfrey
Bridget Holmes
Tarja I Kinnunen
Scott M Nelson
Eugene Oteng-Ntim
Nashita Patel
Stephen C Robson
Jane Sandall
Thomas Sanders
Naveed Sattar
Paul T Seed
Jane Wardle
Lucilla PostonDivision of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and King's Health Partners, 10th floor, North Wing, St,Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK. lucilla.poston@kcl.ac.uk.
King's College London · GBKings Health Partners · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14133Chief Scientist Office CZB/4/680Department of Health SOUDIBRU-2008-1Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1017Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the widespread recognition that obesity in pregnant women is associated with adverse outcomes for mother and child, there is no intervention proven to reduce the risk of these complications. The primary aim of this randomised controlled trial is to assess in obese pregnant women, whether a complex behavioural intervention, based on changing diet (to foods with a lower glycemic index) and physical activity, will reduce the risk of gestational diabetes (GDM) and delivery of a large for gestational age (LGA) infant. A secondary aim is to determine whether the intervention lowers the long term risk of obesity in the offspring. METHODS/

designMulticentre randomised controlled trial comparing a behavioural intervention designed to improve glycemic control with standard antenatal care in obese pregnant women.Inclusion criteria; women with a BMI ≥30 kg/m2 and a singleton pregnancy between 15+0 weeks and 18+6 weeks' gestation. Exclusion criteria; pre-defined, pre-existing diseases and multiple pregnancy. Randomisation is on-line by a computer generated programme and is minimised by BMI category, maternal age, ethnicity, parity and centre. Intervention; this is delivered by a health trainer over 8 sessions. Based on control theory, with elements of social cognitive theory, the intervention is designed to improve maternal glycemic control. Women randomised to the control arm receive standard antenatal care until delivery according to local guidelines. All women have a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test at 27+0- 28+6 weeks' gestation.Primary outcome; Maternal: diagnosis of GDM, according to the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) criteria. Neonatal; infant LGA defined as >90th customised birth weight centile.Sample size; 1546 women to provide 80% power to detect a 25% reduction in the incidence of GDM and a 30% reduction in infants large for gestational age. DISCUSSION: All aspects of this protocol have been evaluated in a pilot randomised controlled trial, with subsequent optimisation of the intervention. The findings of this trial will inform whether lifestyle mediated improvement of glycemic control in obese pregnant women can minimise the risk of pregnancy complications.

trial registrationCurrent controlled trials; ISRCTN89971375.

Indexed as

Life StylePregnancy OutcomeAdultBehavior TherapyBlood GlucoseExercise TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGestational AgeGlycemic IndexHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornMotor ActivityObesityPregnancyBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID24533897
PMCPMC3938821
OpenAlexW2104836599

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.