Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24566962›Full record

ReviewJournal of applied genetics2014

The application of genome-wide SNP genotyping methods in studies on livestock genomes.

Artur Gurgul, Ewelina Semik, Klaudia Pawlina, Tomasz Szmatoła, Igor Jasielczuk, Monika Bugno-Poniewierska

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of applied genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Single-Step Genomic Predictions for Growth and Carcass Traits in Nordic Charolais and Hereford Cattle.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Artur GurgulLaboratory of Genomics, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Krakowska 1, 32-083, Balice, Poland, agurgul@izoo.krakow.pl.
Ewelina Semik
Klaudia Pawlina
Tomasz Szmatoła
Igor Jasielczuk
Monika Bugno-Poniewierska
National Research Institute of Animal Production · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal genomics is currently undergoing dynamic development, which is driven by the flourishing of high-throughput genome analysis methods. Recently, a large number of animals has been genotyped with the use of whole-genome genotyping assays in the course of genomic selection programmes. The results of such genotyping can also be used for studies on different aspects of livestock genome functioning and diversity. In this article, we review the recent literature concentrating on various aspects of animal genomics, including studies on linkage disequilibrium, runs of homozygosity, selection signatures, copy number variation and genetic differentiation of animal populations. Our work is aimed at providing insight into certain achievements of animal genomics and to arouse interest in basic research on the complexity and structure of the genomes of livestock.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA Copy Number VariationsGenomeGenotyping TechniquesLinkage DisequilibriumLivestockPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID24566962
OpenAlexW2074441108

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.