ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2014
Comparative effectiveness of dipeptidylpeptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and mixed treatment comparison.
Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Linagliptin + Metformin vs Metformin Alone on the Role of Pancreatic Islet Function, Insulin Resistance and Markers of Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Prediabetes: Randomized Clinical Trial
Effect of the Combination of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor (DPP4i) and Insulin in Comparison to Insulin on Metabolic Control and Prognosis in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of prusogliptin in type-2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Irish journal of medical science · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with an α-glucosidase inhibitor and a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review with meta-analysis.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2018Pooled it
- Linagliptin versus sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2017Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Methods for Handling Missing Variance Data in Meta-Analyses of Interventions in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Clinical review: Drugs commonly associated with weight change: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2015Pooled it
- Effect of linagliptin plus insulin in comparison to insulin alone on metabolic control and prognosis in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- A Multicentre, Multinational, Open-Label, 52-Week Extension Study of Gemigliptin (LC15-0444) Monotherapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2021Trial
- Dapagliflozin versus saxagliptin as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2018Trial
- Efficacy and safety of liraglutide versus sitagliptin, both in combination with metformin, in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a 26-week, open-label, randomized, active comparator clinical trial.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2016 · on this mapTrial
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists vs Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Use on Risk of Asthma Exacerbation Among Diabetic Patients with Co-Morbid Asthma in Hong Kong.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and DPP-4 Inhibitors in Neuropathic Pain: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Economic assessment of potential changes to essential medicines for diabetes in Uganda.PloS one · 2025Article
- Neuroprotective Effect of Sitagliptin beyond the Incretin Effect: A Narrative Review.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2025Review
- A Narrative Review of Diabetic Macroangiopathy: From Molecular Mechanism to Therapeutic Approaches.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024Review
- Peptide Drugs: Current Status and it's Applications in the Treatment of Various Diseases.Current drug research reviews · 2024Review
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, and Dose-Increasing Study on the Safety, Tolerability and PK/PD of Multiple Doses of HSK7653 by Oral Administration in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024Article
- Advances in oral peptide drug nanoparticles for diabetes mellitus treatment.Bioactive materials · 2022Review
- Role of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors in the new era of antidiabetic treatment.World journal of diabetes · 2022Review
- Angiogenic content of microparticles in patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease predicts networks of endothelial dysfunction.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2022Article
- Emerging therapies: The potential roles SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP1 agonists, and ARNI therapy for ARNI pulmonary hypertension.Pulmonary circulation · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the safety and efficacy of the dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control.
designSystematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), health economic evaluation studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, followed by primary Bayesian mixed treatment comparison meta-analyses (MTCs), and secondary frequentist direct-comparison meta-analyses using a random-effects model. Outcomes were reported as weighted mean change from baseline, or odds ratio (OR) with 95% credible interval. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE, and BIOSIS via Dialog ProQuest; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews via EBSCO; four diabetes and two technical congress abstracts; and health technology assessment organization websites. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control receiving any pharmacological anti-diabetic treatment. DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS: Title/abstracts were reviewed for eligibility, followed by full-text review of publications remaining after first pass. A three-person team filtered articles and an independent reviewer checked a random selection (10%) of filtered articles. Data extraction and quality assessment of studies were also independently reviewed. Five DPP-4 inhibitors (alogliptin, linagliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin, and vildagliptin) were compared via meta-analysis (where data were available) as monotherapy, dual therapy (plus metformin, sulfonylurea, pioglitazone, or insulin), and triple therapy (plus metformin/sulfonylurea).
resultsThe review identified 6,601 articles; 163 met inclusion criteria and 85 publications from 83 RCTs contained sufficient or appropriate data for analysis. MTCs demonstrated no differences between DPP-4 inhibitors in mean change from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) or body weight, or the proportions of patients achieving HbA1c <7% or experiencing a hypoglycemic event, apart from in patients on alogliptin plus metformin, who achieved HbA1c <7% more frequently than those treated with saxagliptin plus metformin [OR 6.41 (95% CI 3.15-11.98) versus 2.17 (95% CI 1.56-2.95)].
conclusionsThis systematic review and MTC showed similar efficacy and safety for DPP-4 inhibitors as treatment for type 2 diabetes, either as monotherapy or combination therapy.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.