Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24675550›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

An evolutionary analysis of antigen processing and presentation across different timescales reveals pervasive selection.

Diego Forni, Rachele Cagliani, Claudia Tresoldi, Uberto Pozzoli, Luca De Gioia, Giulia Filippi, Stefania Riva, Giorgia Menozzi, Marta Colleoni, Mara Biasin and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Diego ForniScientific Institute IRCCS E. MEDEA, Bioinformatics, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Rachele CaglianiScientific Institute IRCCS E. MEDEA, Bioinformatics, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Claudia TresoldiScientific Institute IRCCS E. MEDEA, Bioinformatics, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Uberto PozzoliScientific Institute IRCCS E. MEDEA, Bioinformatics, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Luca De GioiaDepartment of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Giulia FilippiDepartment of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Stefania RivaScientific Institute IRCCS E. MEDEA, Bioinformatics, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Giorgia MenozziScientific Institute IRCCS E. MEDEA, Bioinformatics, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Marta ColleoniScientific Institute IRCCS E. MEDEA, Bioinformatics, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Mara BiasinDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Sergio Lo CaputoInfectious Disease Unit, S. Maria Annunziata Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Francesco MazzottaInfectious Disease Unit, S. Maria Annunziata Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Giacomo P ComiDino Ferrari Centre, Department of Physiopathology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Fondazione Ca' Granda IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Nereo BresolinScientific Institute IRCCS E. MEDEA, Bioinformatics, Bosisio Parini, Italy; Dino Ferrari Centre, Department of Physiopathology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Fondazione Ca' Granda IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Mario ClericiChair of Immunology, Department of Physiopathology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Don C. Gnocchi Foundation ONLUS, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Manuela SironiScientific Institute IRCCS E. MEDEA, Bioinformatics, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
IRCCS Eugenio Medea · ITOspedale Santa Maria Annunziata · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITDon Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The antigenic repertoire presented by MHC molecules is generated by the antigen processing and presentation (APP) pathway. We analyzed the evolutionary history of 45 genes involved in APP at the inter- and intra-species level. Results showed that 11 genes evolved adaptively in mammals. Several positively selected sites involve positions of fundamental importance to the protein function (e.g. the TAP1 peptide-binding domains, the sugar binding interface of langerin, and the CD1D trafficking signal region). In CYBB, all selected sites cluster in two loops protruding into the endosomal lumen; analysis of missense mutations responsible for chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) showed the action of different selective forces on the very same gene region, as most CGD substitutions involve aminoacid positions that are conserved in all mammals. As for ERAP2, different computational methods indicated that positive selection has driven the recurrent appearance of protein-destabilizing variants during mammalian evolution. Application of a population-genetics phylogenetics approach showed that purifying selection represented a major force acting on some APP components (e.g. immunoproteasome subunits and chaperones) and allowed identification of positive selection events in the human lineage. We also investigated the evolutionary history of APP genes in human populations by developing a new approach that uses several different tests to identify the selection target, and that integrates low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data with Sanger sequencing. This analysis revealed that 9 APP genes underwent local adaptation in human populations. Most positive selection targets are located within noncoding regions with regulatory function in myeloid cells or act as expression quantitative trait loci. Conversely, balancing selection targeted nonsynonymous variants in TAP1 and CD207 (langerin). Finally, we suggest that selected variants in PSMB10 and CD207 contribute to human phenotypes. Thus, we used evolutionary information to generate experimentally-testable hypotheses and to provide a list of sites to prioritize in follow-up analyses.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticAllelesAnimalsAntigen PresentationAntigens, CDATP-Binding Cassette TransportersATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 2Evolution, MolecularGenetics, PopulationHumansLectins, C-TypeMammalsMannose-Binding LectinsMembrane GlycoproteinsNADPH Oxidase 2NADPH OxidasesAntigens, CDATP-Binding Cassette TransportersATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 2CD207 protein, humanCYBB protein, humanLectins, C-TypeMannose-Binding LectinsMembrane GlycoproteinsNADPH Oxidase 2NADPH OxidasesTAP1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24675550
PMCPMC3967941
OpenAlexW2046842975

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.