ArticleBMC bioinformatics2014
A comprehensive study of small non-frameshift insertions/deletions in proteins and prediction of their phenotypic effects by a machine learning method (KD4i).
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- PON-Del predictor for sequence retaining protein deletions.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Learning genotype-phenotype associations from gaps in multi-species sequence alignments.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Variant Impact Predictor database (VIPdb), version 2: trends from three decades of genetic variant impact predictors.Human genomics · 2024Article
- Variant Impact Predictor database (VIPdb), version 2: Trends from 25 years of genetic variant impact predictors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Insertion-Deletion Events Are Depleted in Protein Regions with Predicted Secondary Structure.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- SHINE: protein language model-based pathogenicity prediction for short inframe insertion and deletion variants.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Class I and II NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductases exhibit different roles in triterpenoid biosynthesis inFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Insertions and deletions in the RNA sequence-structure map.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- Variation benchmark datasets: update, criteria, quality and applications.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020Article
- VIPdb, a genetic Variant Impact Predictor Database.Human mutation · 2019Article
- Pathogenicity and functional impact of non-frameshifting insertion/deletion variation in the human genome.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Effects of short indels on protein structure and function in human genomes.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- The role of small in-frame insertions/deletions in inherited eye disorders and how structural modelling can help estimate their pathogenicity.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2016Article
- Computational approaches to study the effects of small genomic variations.Journal of molecular modeling · 2015Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSmall insertion and deletion polymorphisms (Indels) are the second most common mutations in the human genome, after Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs). Recent studies have shown that they have significant influence on genetic variation by altering human traits and can cause multiple human diseases. In particular, many Indels that occur in protein coding regions are known to impact the structure or function of the protein. A major challenge is to predict the effects of these Indels and to distinguish between deleterious and neutral variants. When an Indel occurs within a coding region, it can be either frameshifting (FS) or non-frameshifting (NFS). FS-Indels either modify the complete C-terminal region of the protein or result in premature termination of translation. NFS-Indels insert/delete multiples of three nucleotides leading to the insertion/deletion of one or more amino acids.
resultsIn order to study the relationships between NFS-Indels and Mendelian diseases, we characterized NFS-Indels according to numerous structural, functional and evolutionary parameters. We then used these parameters to identify specific characteristics of disease-causing and neutral NFS-Indels. Finally, we developed a new machine learning approach, KD4i, that can be used to predict the phenotypic effects of NFS-Indels.
conclusionsWe demonstrate in a large-scale evaluation that the accuracy of KD4i is comparable to existing state-of-the-art methods. However, a major advantage of our approach is that we also provide the reasons for the predictions, in the form of a set of rules. The rules are interpretable by non-expert humans and they thus represent new knowledge about the relationships between the genotype and phenotypes of NFS-Indels and the causative molecular perturbations that result in the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.