ReviewDrug, healthcare and patient safety2014
Patient safety and minimizing risk with insulin administration - role of insulin degludec.
Review in Drug, healthcare and patient safety, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
NN1250-3582: A 52-week Randomised, Controlled, Open Label, Multicentre, Multinational Treat-to-target Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of SIBA and Insulin Glargine Both Administered Once Daily in a Basal-bolus Regimen With Insulin Aspart as Mealtime Insulin ± Treatment With Metformin, ± Pioglitazone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Currently Treated With Insulin Qualifying for Intensified Treatment/NN1250-3667: An Extension Trial to NN1250-3582 Comparing Safety and Efficacy of NN1250 and Insulin Glargine, Both With Insulin Aspart as Meal-time Insulin ± OADs in Type 2 Diabetes (BEGIN™: BB)
NN1250-3583: A 52 Week Randomised, Controlled, Open Label, Multicentre, Multinational, Parallel, Treat-to-target Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of SIBA and Insulin Glargine Both Administered Once Daily in a Basal-bolus Regimen With Insulin Aspart as Mealtime Insulin in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes (BEGIN™: BB T1 LONG) / NN1250-3644: An Extension Trial to Trial NN1250-3583 Comparing Safety and Efficacy of NN1250 With Insulin Glargine, Both With Insulin Aspart as Meal-time Insulin, in Type 1 Diabetes (BEGIN™: T1)
A Pan Asian Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Insulin NN1250 and Insulin Glargine as Add on to OAD(s) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (BEGIN™: ONCE ASIA)
A Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of NN1250 and Insulin Glargine in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (BEGIN™: LOW VOLUME)
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical perspectives on the frequency of hypoglycemia in treat-to-target randomized controlled trials comparing basal insulin analogs in type 2 diabetes: a narrative review.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2024Review
- Pancreatic transplant surgery and stem cell therapy: Finding the balance between therapeutic advances and ethical principles.World journal of stem cells · 2022Review
- GP2-enriched pancreatic progenitors give rise to functional beta cells in vivo and eliminate the risk of teratoma formation.Stem cell reports · 2022Article
- New Horizons: Next-Generation Insulin Analogues: Structural Principles and Clinical Goals.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022Review
- Use of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus: Expert Panel Recommendations on Appropriate Practice Patterns.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Review
- In vivo hyperglycaemia exposure elicits distinct period-dependent effects on human pancreatic progenitor differentiation, conveyed by oxidative stress.Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Differentiating Basal Insulin Preparations: Understanding How They Work Explains Why They Are Different.Advances in therapy · 2019Review
- Advancing Patient Safety and Access to Concentrated Insulin (U-500 Regular Insulin) in the Veterans Health Administration: A Clinician Education Program in the Primary Care Setting.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2018Article
- Cell Therapy for Type 1 Diabetes: Current and Future Strategies.Current diabetes reports · 2017Review
- Novel route of insulin delivery using an implant-mediated drug delivery system.Drug delivery and translational research · 2017Article
- Efficacy of oral versus insulin therapy for newly diagnosed diabetes in low-income settings.Archives of general internal medicine · 2017Article
- Preclinical and Clinical Studies for Sodium Tungstate: Application in Humans.Journal of clinical & cellular immunology · 2015Article
- Forum for Injection Technique and Therapy Expert Recommendations, India: The Indian Recommendations for Best Practice in Insulin Injection Technique, 2017.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes is a lifelong condition requiring ongoing medical care and patient self-management. Exogenous insulin therapy is essential in type 1 diabetes and becomes a necessity in patients with longstanding type 2 diabetes who fail to achieve optimal control with lifestyle modification, oral agents, and glucagon-like peptide 1-based therapy. One of the risks that hinders insulin use is hypoglycemia. Optimal insulin therapy should therefore minimize the risk of hypoglycemia while improving glycemic control. Insulin degludec (IDeg) is a novel basal insulin that, following subcutaneous injection, assembles into a depot of soluble multihexamer chains. These subsequently release IDeg monomers that are absorbed at a slow and steady rate into the circulation, with the terminal half-life of IDeg being ~25 hours. Thus, it requires only once-daily dosing unlike other basal insulin preparations that often require twice-daily dosing. Despite its long half-life, once-daily IDeg does not cause accumulation of insulin in the circulation after reaching steady state. IDeg once a day will produce a steady-state profile with a lower peak:trough ratio than other basal insulins. In clinical trials, this profile translates into a lower frequency of nocturnal hypoglycemia compared with insulin glargine, as well as an ability to allow some flexibility in dose timing without compromising efficacy and safety. Indeed, a study that tested the extremes of dosing intervals of 8 and 40 hours showed no detriment in either glycemic control or hypoglycemic frequency versus insulin glargine given at the same time each day. While extreme flexibility in dose timing is not recommended, these findings are reassuring. This may be particularly beneficial to elderly patients, patients with learning difficulties, or others who have to rely on health-care professionals for their daily insulin injections. Further studies are required to confirm whether this might benefit adherence to treatment, reduce long-term hypoglycemia or reduce diabetes-related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.