Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24829487›Full record

ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2014

Micronutrient research, programs, and policy: From meta-analyses to metabolomics.

Lindsay H Allen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lindsay H AllenUSDA, Agricultural Research Service Western Human Nutrition Research Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA lindsay.allen@ars.usda.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micronutrient deficiencies are widespread among women and children in undernourished populations. Research has identified effective approaches to their prevention, including supplementation, fortification, and dietary and other public health interventions. These interventions have made tremendous improvements in the quality of life, health, and survival of populations around the world, yet the impact varies by nutrient, population, and the outcomes chosen that reflect nutritionally driven change. The WHO guides governments and agencies toward effective strategies to prevent micronutrient deficiencies in women and children, but these are often informed by imperfect studies with limited measures of impact and the inadequate program evaluations and survey databases produced by the nutrition community. The resulting knowledge gaps limit our ability to discern what interventions are effective, under what conditions, among whom, and perhaps most important, why. However, we are moving into an era of opportunity to apply the tools of modern nutrition science, including improved methods of assessing nutritional status, "omics," bioarchival access, systems biology thinking, and interdisciplinary collaborations, that can deepen and broaden our understanding of how micronutrients affect health, how their deficiencies diminish human capacity, and how interventions can improve the well-being of those in need. Relevant training and greater cross-disciplinary efforts will be required to ensure a cell-to-society approach that can systematically address where, to whom, and how to provide micronutrients in the future.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsFood, FortifiedMicronutrientsNutrition PolicyChildChild Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMeta-Analysis as TopicMetabolomicsNutritional StatusQuality of LifeMicronutrients

Identifiers

PMID24829487
PMCPMC4013192

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.